摘要
从技术和经济角度,对比分析了大华桥水电站与黄登水电站共用大格拉灰岩料源方案、营盘玄武岩料源方案和花坪河与干笔河砂岩料源+营盘玄武岩料源方案。经对比分析,采用大格拉料源方案具有混凝土性能较好,减少施工占地,有利于环境保护及节省投资等优点,因此推荐大华桥水电站与上游黄登电站共用大格拉料源方案。
In terms of technology and cost, Dagala limestone source, Yiugpan basalt source and sandstone source in the Huapinghe and the Ganbihe plus Yingpan basalt source to be shared by both Dahuaqiao Hydropower Project and Huangdeng Hydropower Project are compared and analyzed. Through comparison and analysis, application of the Dagela aggregate source features good concrete performance, little land occupation, environment protection benefit and lower cost. Therefore, it recommends that both Dahuaqiao Hydropower Project and Huangdeng Hydropower Project share Dagala limestone source.
出处
《西北水电》
2016年第3期56-60,共5页
Northwest Hydropower
关键词
混凝土
骨料
料源
大格拉灰岩
营盘玄武岩
concrete
aggregate
material source
Dagela limestone
Yingpan basalt
