摘要
唐初杨士勋在其《春秋穀梁传疏》中引用了大量所谓"旧解"、"旧说"、"一解"以及"或以为"等先唐关于《穀梁传》研究的佚文。本文通过对这些材料的梳理与分类,分析其内容并推定其来源。
In his Chun Qiu Gu Liang Zhuan Shu (Annotations on Gu Liang's Commentary on the Spring and Autumn Annals), the early Tang Dynasty scholar Yang Shixun has cited many so called "old exegetics","old interpretation", "other interpretation" and "someone considered" etc. , to refer to some lost texts. This paper combs and classifies these materials, analyzes the contend and tries to deduce their origins.
出处
《南京师范大学文学院学报》
CSSCI
2016年第2期161-166,共6页
Journal of School of Chinese Language and Culture Nanjing Normal University
关键词
杨士勋
《春秋穀梁传疏》
旧解
Yang Shixun
Chun Qiu Gu Liang Zhuan Shu
old exegetics