期刊文献+

两种A型肉毒毒素在前额的弥散性比较 被引量:7

Diffuseness comparison of two kinds of botulinum toxins type A on the forehead
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨两种注射用A型肉毒毒素(保妥适和衡力)在前额的弥散性,以及皮内注射和皮下注射对药物弥散性的影响。方法选取健康志愿者20名,在前额4个部位分别注射0.05ml(2U)的A型肉毒毒素。随机选择在一侧前额的中部和颞侧注射保妥适,而在另一侧前额的中部和颞侧注射衡力;其中前额中部行皮下注射,颞侧行皮内注射。注射后第14天进行微碘一淀粉试验,拍摄前额照片,计算每块无汗晕环的面积,最大垂直和水平弥散距离。结果皮内注射时,保妥适的无汗晕面积(144±14)mm^2、垂直弥散距离(14.4±1.1)mm和水平弥散距离(10.8±0.6)mm,均显著小于衡力的无汗晕面积(180±15)mm^2、垂直弥散距离(15.8±1.0)mm和水平弥散距离(12.5±0.7)mm,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。皮下注射时,保妥适的无汗晕面积(183±18)mm^2显著小于衡力的无汗晕面积(207±17)mm^2,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);保妥适的水平弥散距离(12.2±0.7)mm稍小于衡力的水平弥散距离(13.2±0.6)mm(P=0.06)。保妥适的水平弥散距离,皮内注射小于皮下注射,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);而衡力皮内注射和皮下注射的弥散距离差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论保妥适弥散性小于衡力,临床药效更加可控。相对于皮下注射,皮内注射可以减少A型肉毒毒素的弥散性。 Objective To evaluate the diffuse characteristics of two types of botulinum toxin type A (BOTOX and CBTX-A) in the forehead and the effect of intradermal (ID) and subcutanous (SC) infections on their diffusion. Methods Healthy volunteers (n =20) were recruited to receive a 0.05 ml (2 U) injection of botulinum toxin type A at four forehead sites [both sides of medial forehead (SC) and temporal forehead (ID)], one side for BOTOX and another for CBTX-A. On day 14, the Minors' iodine starch test was performed and photographs were taken for calculating the area and dimensions of anhydrotic area. Results The areas of anhidrosis ID were significantly greater with CBTX A (180±15) mm^2 than that of BOTOX (144±14) mm^2. The same conditions occurred in vertical dimensions (14.4±1.1) mm vs. (15.8±1.0) mm and horizontal dimensions (10.8±0.6) mm vs. (12.5±0.7) mm. There was significant variation between the both for diffuseness in the two anhidrotic halos observed after ID injection (P〈0.05). The areas of anhidrosis by SC were significantly greater with CBTX-A (207±17) mm^2 than that in BOTOX (183±18) mm^2. The mean horizontal dimension was greater with CBTX-A by SC (13.2±0.6) mm than that of BOTOX by SC (12.2±0.7) mm, but not statistically significant (P = 0.06). The mean horizontal dimension in BOTOX was significantly greater with SC than that with ID (P〈0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between SC and ID administration of CBTX-A. Conclusions BOTOX diffuses less than CBTX-A. ID injection technique may result in less diffusion than SC.
出处 《中华医学美学美容杂志》 2016年第3期150-153,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Aesthetics and Cosmetology
关键词 A型肉毒毒素 保妥适 衡力 弥散性 皮内注射 皮下注射 Botulinum toxin type A BOTOX CBTX-A Diffusion Subcutaneous injection Intradermal injection
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Glaser DA. The use of botulinum toxins to treat hyperhidrosis and gustatory sweating syndrome [J]. Neurotox Res, 2006, 9(2 3):173- 177.
  • 2Kleinberg M, Mosdell KW. Current and future considerations for the new classes of biologicals [J]. Am J Health Syst Pharm, 2004,61(7) :695- 708.
  • 3Trindade de Almeida AR, Marques E, de Almeida J, et al. Pi lot study comparing the diffusion of two formulations of botu linum toxin type A in patients with forehead hyperhidro sis [J]. Dermatol Surg, 2007,33(1 Spec No.):S37 -43.
  • 4Borodic GE, Ferrante R, Pearce LB, et al. Histologic assess- ment of dose-related diffusion and muscle fiber response after therapeutic botulinum A toxin injections [J]. Mov Disord, 1994,9(1) :31-39.
  • 5Hsu TS, Dover JS, Arndt KA. Effect of volume and concen tration on the diffusion of botulinum exotoxin A [J]. Arch Dermatol, 2004,140(11) : 1351-1354.
  • 6朱麟,孙波.两种稀释浓度A型肉毒毒素治疗动力性额横纹的疗效观察[J].中华医学美学美容杂志,2015,21(6):354-356. 被引量:7
  • 7于波,陈敏亮.A型肉毒毒素在美容外科应用的新进展[J].中华医学美学美容杂志,2008,14(5):355-357. 被引量:7
  • 8Hexsel D, DalPForno T, Hexsel C, et al. A randomized pilot study comparing the action halos of two commercial prepara- tions of botulinum toxin type A [J]. Dermatol Surg, 2008, 34(1) :52- 59.
  • 9Flynn TC, Clark RE. Botulinum toxin type B (Myobloc) ver- sus botulinum toxin type A (BOTOX) frontalis study: rate o{ onset and radius of diffusion [J]. Dermatol Surg, 2003, 29(5):519- 522.
  • 10Cliff SH, Judodihardjo H, Eltringham E. Different formula- tions of botulinum toxin type A have different migration char- acteristics: a double-blind, randomized study [J]. J Cosmet Dermatol, 2008,7(1) :50 -54.

二级参考文献46

  • 1郜泽誉,朱艳,张志磊,赵鹏.研究应用A型肉毒毒素进行面部除皱的临床疗效[J].中国医疗美容,2014,4(1):83-83. 被引量:8
  • 2于建敏,王艳,宋红平.A型肉毒毒素加强法治疗面肌痉挛[J].中国神经免疫学和神经病学杂志,2003,10(3):190-190. 被引量:9
  • 3朱力,王恒樑,黄留玉.肉毒毒素研究进展[J].生物技术通讯,2005,16(2):186-190. 被引量:32
  • 4袁继龙,王明利,柳大烈,袁强.A型肉毒毒素治疗鼻唇沟纹的临床应用[J].中国实用美容整形外科杂志,2005,16(4):229-230. 被引量:17
  • 5陈敏亮,柴家科,宋慧锋,许明火,吴焱秋,马彩虹.应用A型肉毒毒素治疗面肌痉挛[J].中国美容医学,2007,16(5):620-622. 被引量:4
  • 6Schiavo G, Matteoli M, Montecucco C. Neurotoxins affecting neuroexocytosis. Physiol Rev, 2000, 80(2):717-720.
  • 7Foran PG, Mohammed N, Lisk GO, et al. Evaluation of the therapeutic usefulness of botulinum neurotoxin B, C1, E, and F compared with the long lasting type A: Basis for distinct durations of inhibition of exocytosis in central neurons. J Biol Chem, 2003,278(2):1363 -1364.
  • 8Lowe N J, Yamauchi P. Cosmetic uses of botulinum toxins for lower aspects of the face and neck. Clin Dermatol, 2004, 22 (1): 3-6.
  • 9Castro WH, Gomez RS, Da Silva OJ, et al. Botulinum toxin type A in the management of masseter muscle hypertrophy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2005,63(1) :20-21.
  • 10Fagien S. Botox for the treatment of dynamic and hyperkinetic facial lines and furrows: adjunctive use in facial aesthetic surgery. Plast Reconatr Surg, 1999,103(1) : 701-803.

共引文献15

同被引文献75

引证文献7

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部