期刊文献+

三种桩核系统对增强喇叭口根管抗折性能的研究 被引量:2

The fracture resistance of flared root canal tooth restored with three different post systems
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较三种不同桩核系统修复喇叭口根管后的抗折性能。方法选择30颗因正畸拔除的下颌第一前磨牙,常规根管治疗后截冠形成喇叭口状外形。随机分成3组,分别行钴铬合金、单支纤维桩、纤维主辅桩桩核冠修复。将所有样本包埋后,用电子力学试验机施加载荷,进行抗折性能测试。结果牙根抗折强度钴铬合金组小于单支纤维桩组和纤维主辅桩组(P<0.05),单支纤维桩组小于纤维主辅桩组(P<0.05)。结论在喇叭口根管修复中,应用纤维主辅桩组修复临床效果较好。 Objective : To compare the fracture resistance of flared root canal restored with three different post systems. Methods: Thirty extracted mandibular premolars were endodontically treated before crown truncation, and then were ran- domly divided into three groups. Each group teeth were restored with Co-Cr alloy, alone fiber and fiber post combined with accessory post systems differently. The fracture resistance test was done with universal material testing machine by all the specimens. Results: The fracture resistance strength of flared root canal teeth restored with Co-Cr alloy systems group was lower than fiber alone and fiber post combined with accessory post( P 〈 0. 05 ), fiber alone was lower than fiber post com- bined with accessory post(P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion: The fiber post combined with accessory post is recommended in flared root canal tooth restoration.
出处 《泰山医学院学报》 CAS 2016年第5期487-488,共2页 Journal of Taishan Medical College
基金 中国博士后科学基金面上资助(2012M512141)
关键词 桩核 喇叭口根管 抗折性能 post and core Eared root canal fracture resistance
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献30

  • 1余勇,殷新民,於文雪.不同桩材料对双根管桩核冠牙本质应力的影响[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2005,21(9):550-552. 被引量:6
  • 2LI Li-li,WANG Zhong-yi,BAI Zhong-cheng,MAO Yong,GAO Bo,XIN Hai-tao,ZHOU Bing,ZHANG Yong,LIU Bing.Three-dimensional finite element analysis of weakened roots restored with different cements in combination with titanium alloy posts[J].Chinese Medical Journal,2006(4):305-311. 被引量:26
  • 3Hagge MS, Wong RD, Lindemuth JS. Effect of dowel space preparation and composite cement thickness on retention of a prefabricated dowel[J]. J Prosthodont, 2002, 11(1): 19-24.
  • 4Patierno JM, Rueggeberg FA, Anderson RW, et al. Push-out strength and SEM evaluation of resin composite bonded to internal cervical dentin [J]. Endod Dent Traumatol, 1996, 12(5): 227-236.
  • 5Btittel L, Krastl G, Lorch H, et al. Influence of post fit and post length on fracture resistance[J]. Int Endod J, 2009, 42(1): 47-53.
  • 6Chan FW, Harcourt JK, Brockhurst PJ. The effect of post adaptation in the root canal on retention of posts cemented with various cements[J]. Aust Dent J, 1993, 38(1): 39-45.
  • 7Alster D, Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, et al. Polymerization contraction stress in thin resin composite layers as a function of layer thickness[J]. Dent Mater, 1997, 13(3): 146-150.
  • 8Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Sahafi A. Finite element analysis of stresses in endodontically treated, dowel-restored teeth [J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2005, 94(4): 321-329.
  • 9Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores [J]. Am J Dent, 2000, 13(Spec No): 15B-18B.
  • 10Raygot CG, Chai J, Jameson DL. Fracture resistance and primary failure mode of endodontically treated teeth restored with a carbon fiber-reinforced resin post system in vitro [J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2001, 14(2): 141-145.

共引文献25

同被引文献23

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部