论我国民事诉讼的当事人恒定主义

The Client Eternally-fixed Doctrine In China Civil Litigation

2015年《最高人民法院关于适用<中华人民共和国民事诉讼法>的解释》明确我国实行以当事人主义恒定为原则、诉讼承继主义为例外的规定,但是简短的条文难以解决司法实践的问题,尤其对案外受让人缺乏程序保障,使得既判力主观范围扩张缺乏正当性基础。通过对我国现行条文中的当事人恒定主义要件进行分析,借鉴域外的程序保障观念,并且明确既判力主观扩张之限制、案外受让人程序保障之措施、我国第三人的制度之完善以及适用诉讼承继之具体情形,为我国当事人恒定主义的现实适用提供解决路径。

The issue of Supreme People＇s Court on the Application of ＂People＇s Republic of China Civil Procedure Law＂Interpretation clearly pointed that China regard privy forever as principle and suit acceding as exception. However,the short of the provisions is difficult to solve problems of judicial practice. Especially,the lacks of procedural safeguards of assignees make the subjective scope＇s expansion of res judicata lack legitimacy foundation. In order to give assignees perfect procedural safeguard that our privy forever principle application provide suitable solving path,this paper will analyze the existing provisions of the privy forever principle requirement,use the concept of procedural safeguards from other country for reference and define the specific circumstances of the suit acceding,the introduction of the objective scope＇s expansion of res judicata clearly and the perfection of third party system.