期刊文献+

《大宪章》的历史底蕴及其对英国封建君主政治的影响 被引量:5

Magna Carta:Historic Value and Influences over English Feudal Politics of Monarchy
原文传递
导出
摘要 《大宪章》是英国封建王权与贵族、教会矛盾冲突的必然产物。无论是表述话语、思想框架还是权益诉求上,《大宪章》都彰显了那个时代固有的封建性。《大宪章》条款的主体部分,乃是要将君主肆意独裁所跨越的封建权益边界厘定下来,恢复贵族、教会的传统特权。同时,其中对城市特权的承诺及其一些模糊的表述,也为后人的解读提供了宽泛的想象空间。在其颁布后的数个世纪中,《大宪章》不断被确认,在一定程度上限制了王权。但另一方面,《大宪章》又不断遭到王权的践踏,直至在都铎"新君主制"扼制下处于"沉潜"状态。只是到了17世纪初,随着社会政治现实的变动,《大宪章》才被赋予了"自由""权利""法治"等"现代性"思想内核,并为19世纪后期勃兴的"辉格诠释模式"加以阐扬,但这一将现实与历史机械对接的做法在西方史学界不断遭到质疑。由此,如何解读《大宪章》的历史底蕴及其政治影响,应该引起中国史学界的重视。 Magna Carta was an inevitable outcome of the conflict between the English feudal monarchy and nobility,along with the church. It demonstrated feudalism of medieval England in its expressions,ideologies and appealing interests. Its main terms were to determine the boundary of the feudal rights and interests that the king had crossed with his arbitrary rule,and restore the old privilege enjoyed by the nobles and the church. Meanwhile,its promises and some vague statements on the cities' rights and liberties gave people broad space for imaginary interpretation in the following centuries. It was reconfirmed repeatedly over the next few centuries and indeed brought limits to the monarch. But it was also being oppressed by the monarch until it went into dormant under the restriction of the "New Monarch"of the Tudor period. It was not until the seventeenth century did Magna Carta resumed its energy by being related with some "modern"ideas such as "freedom","rights","governed by law",etc.,and later being praised with the nineteenth century "Whig interpretation ". However, such understandings were now considered an abrupt connection relating the present and the past,and thus being questioned by the Western historians. The question of how to interpret Magna Carta's historic value and political influences should raise great attention of the Chinese historians.
作者 孟广林 裴沛
出处 《史学史研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期43-55,共13页 Journal of Historiography
关键词 《大宪章》 贵族 封建特权 政治影响 辉格诠释模式 Magna Carta nobility feudal privileges political influence Whig interpretation
  • 相关文献

参考文献56

  • 1Bllis Sandoz, The Roots of Liberty : Magna Carta, Ancient Constitution, and the Anglo - American Tradition of Rule of Law Columbia, 1993, p. 2.
  • 2http ://magnacarta800th. corn/.
  • 3N. Zacour , An lntrodttctiort to Medieval Institutions ,London,1978, p. 123.
  • 4N. Zacour , An Introduction to Medieval Institutions , p. 129.
  • 5J. Dickinson , ed. & trans. , The Statesman's Book of John of Salisbury , New York , 1927,p. 65.
  • 6A. L. Poole, From Domesday Book to Magna Carta, Oxford, 1955, pp. 5 - 7,10 - 11.
  • 7D.C. Douglas & G.W. Greenaway , ed. , English Historical Documents, London, 1955 ,V. 2, p. g01.
  • 8J. C. Dickinson,An Ecclesiastical History of England in the Middle Ades , London,V. 2,p. 137.
  • 9The Statesman's Book of John of Salisbury , ed. & translated by J. Dickinson, New York, 1927, p. 3.
  • 10Glanville , translated by J. Beames, Colorado, 1980,p. 27,.

二级参考文献36

  • 1孟广林.前期英国封建王权对地方郡政的整饬[J].世界历史,2000(1):43-50. 被引量:6
  • 2李云飞.论十户联保制与中世纪英格兰的王权制[J].暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,29(2):139-147. 被引量:6
  • 3赵文洪.中世纪欧洲村庄的自治[J].世界历史,2007(3):85-98. 被引量:23
  • 4S. K. Walker, "Lordship and Lawlessness in the Palatinate of Lancaster, 1370 - 1400", The Journal of British Studies, Vol. 28, No. g (Oct., 1989), p. 329.
  • 5Michael Prestwich, Edward I, Yale University Press, 1997, p. 259.
  • 6Helen M. Cam, Liberties and Communities in Medieval England, London: Merlin Press, 1963, p. 176,p. 175.
  • 7Helen M. Cam, The Hundred and the Hundred Rolls, p. 138.
  • 8H. M. Cam, "The Evolution of the Mediaeval English Franchise", Speculum, Vol. 32, No. 3 (Jul. , 1957), p. 428.
  • 9H. M. Cam, "The Evolution of the Mediaeval English Franchise", Speculum, Vol. 32, No. 3 (Jul. , 1957), p. 440.
  • 10C. M. Fraser, "Edward I of England and the Regalian Franchise of Durham", Speculum, Vol. 31, No. 2 (Apr. , 1956), p. 340.

共引文献21

同被引文献103

引证文献5

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部