摘要
走向"内在生物本质主义"(INBE)既是可能的,也是必要的。进一步研究表明,温和的INBE者没有看到"基因种概念"的真实性和优越性,主张物种本质的"二元论"或"多元论",是错误的。物种的本质可以而且应该归结为物种成员之共同拥有的内在微观结构——"DNA序列片段",即未来的、新的、理想的物种"DNA条形码"。它是物种内在本质属性的典型载体,属于"基因种概念",体现了物种的"真实本质",不仅能够解释其他物种概念所能够解释的,而且还能够解释它们所不能解释的,由此可以作为物种唯一的、内在的本质而存在。这是物种本质"一元论",属于激进的INBE。激进的INBE是成立的,因为"DNA条形码"是在物种的形成演变过程中确立的,蕴涵了物种演化、变异的历史性、生态性和关系性,体现了"整体化的‘基因还原论’"以及"历史蕴涵的‘基因决定论’"。
It is both possible and necessary to move towards 'intrinsic biological essentialism '( INBE).Further studies show that moderatist of INBE didn't see the validity and superiority of the concept of the'Genospecies',so it is wrong to insist on'dualism'or'pluralism'of the nature of species. The nature of species should attribute to the inner microstructure that they share completely — 'segments of DNA sequence',namely,the new and ideal species 'DNA barcode'in future.It is the typical carrier of intrinsic nature of species which indicates the 'real essence' of species and belonging to the 'concept of Genospecies'. It is can act as the unique intrinsic nature of species for it can explain what the concept of other species are able to explain and what they can't. We call it's'monism',belongs to the radical INBE. Radical INBE is true,as'DNA barcode'is established in the formation and evolution of species,contains the history,ecology and relationship of species evolution and variation,indicates the 'integration of genetic reductionism'and 'Historical genetic determinism'.
出处
《世界哲学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第4期61-71,160,共11页
World Philosophy
基金
2014年度国家社科基金重点项目"生态学整体论-还原论争论及其解决路径研究"(项目编号:14AZX008)
2013年度教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"生态学实验实在论与建构论研究"(项目编号:13YJA720019)的阶段性成果