期刊文献+

中国工业部门能源与非能源替代弹性研究——基于多弹性测度方法 被引量:7

Research of Energy and Non-energy Substitution for Industrial Sector——Based on Muti-elasticity Method
原文传递
导出
摘要 在能源供应受到较强约束下,能源与非能源要素替代的不确定性关系到我国能源效率改善、新能源开发以及应对气候变化的政策选择。文中以工业总体和36个分行业为研究对象,基于超对数成本函数,计算了1994-2011年间能源与非能源投入要素的自价格弹性、CPE、AES、MES以及SES弹性。结论显示:(1)资本、劳动力和能源的自价格弹性均为负值,其中能源自价格弹性最小,劳动力自价格弹性最大;(2)工业总体上,能源与资本均呈现替代关系,且历史波动趋势较为平稳;而能源与劳动力之间的关系除了在2011年表现不明朗外,其他年份均显示两者为替代关系;(3)四种弹性形式均显示能源和资本呈替代关系的有30个工业行业,均得到能源和劳动力呈互补关系的有21个行业;(4)在所有的替代关系中,CPE值最小,而MES和SES值相对较大,更倾向于得到两投入要素为替代关系的结论。 With the limitation of energy supply,the uncertainty of substitution between energy and non-energyfactors is regarded as a key process to determine the energy efficiency improvement,new energy development and climate change mitigation policies.Taking the whole industry and 36 sub-industry sectors as samplings,the current paper applies the translog cost function specification to estimate the energy and non-energy own-price substitution,CPE substitution,AES,MES and SES during 1994-2011.The obtained results show several points.( 1) The own-price substitution elasticities of capital,labor and energy are negative,and those for energy are the smallest,labor and capital hold the first place.( 2) Energy and capital are substitutes and remain fairly stable in the time series,and energy and labor are substitutes except that in 2011 with mixing performance.( 3) Among the estimates from the four forms of elasticities of substitution,30 sub-industries demonstrate substantial substitution possibilities between energy and capital,and 21 sub-industries witness that energy and labor is complementary.( 4) The substitution values obtained by CPE are smaller than those measured by MES and SES which are easy to find substitutes between two inputs.
出处 《管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第6期180-191,共12页 Management Review
基金 国家自然科学基金青年项目(71203092) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(NJ20150035)
关键词 能源 替代弹性 要素替代 超对数成本函数 energy elasticities of substitution factor substitution translog cost function
  • 相关文献

参考文献39

  • 1Jorgenson D. W. The Role of Energy in Productivity Growth [ J]. The Energy Journal, 1984,5(3) :11-26.
  • 2Kuper G. H., Van Soest D. P. Path-dependency and Input Substitution : Implications for Energy Policy Modelling [ J ]. Energy Eco- nomics, 2002,25 (4) : 397-407.
  • 3Lecca P., Swales J. K., Turner K. An Investigation of Issues Relating to Where Energy Should Enter the Production Function[ J] Economic Modelling, 2011,28 (6) : 2832-2841.
  • 4Chichilnisky G., Heal G. Who Should Abate Carbon Emissions? An International Viewpoint[ R]. NBER Working Papers 4425, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc., 1993.
  • 5Thompson H. Energy Taxes and Wages in a General Equilibrium Model of Production[ J ]. OPEC Review, 2000,24(3) :185-193.
  • 6JacobY. H. D., Reilly J. M., Mcfarl J. R., Paltsev S. Technology and Technical Change in the MIT EPPA Model[ J]. Energy Economics, 2006,28(5-6) :610-631.
  • 7Sorrell S. Energy Substitution, Technical Change and Rebound Effects[ J]. Energies, 2014,7(5) :2850-2873.
  • 8Thompson H. The Applied Theory of Energy Substitution in Production[ J 1- Energy Economics, 2006,28 (4) :410-425.
  • 9Koetse M. J., De Groot H. L. F., Florax R. J. G. M. Capital-energy Substitution and Shifts in Factor Demand : A Meta-analysis [ J ]. Energy Economics, 2008,30( 5 ) :2236-2251.
  • 10Frondel M. Modelling Energy and Non-energy Substitution: A Brief Survey of Elasticities [ J ]. Energy Policy, 2011,39 (8) :4601- 4604.

二级参考文献128

共引文献5912

同被引文献106

引证文献7

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部