期刊文献+

上肢机器人辅助疗法对急性期脑卒中患者上肢运动功能的效果 被引量:24

Effects of Upper Limb Robot-assisted Therapy on Motor Recovery in Patients with Acute Stroke
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨上肢机器人辅助疗法对急性期偏瘫患者上肢运动功能的效果。方法 2013年8月~2014年9月,46例急性期脑卒中患者随机分为实验组和对照组各23例。两组均进行常规康复训练,实验组增加上肢机器人辅助疗法训练,对照组增加上肢重复性运动训练,30 min/d,5 d/周,共12周。治疗前后分别采用Fugl-Meyer上肢部分(FM-UL)评定上肢及手部的运动功能,改良Ashworth量表(MAS)评定肘关节肌张力,改良Barthel指数(MBI)评定日常生活活动能力。结果治疗后,两组患者FM-UL评分、MAS分级、MBI均较治疗前改善(t〉3.856,Z〉1.889,P〈0.05),且实验组FM-UL评分、MAS分级优于对照组(t=-2.386,Z=-2.625,P〈0.05),实验组MBI与对照组比较无显著性差异(t=-1.326,P=0.098)。结论上肢机器人辅助疗法可促进急性期脑卒中患者上肢运动功能恢复。 Objective To explore the effects of upper limb robot-assisted therapy on motor recovery in acute stroke patients. Methods From August, 2013 to September, 2014, 46 acute stroke patients at their first-ever stroke were enrolled and randomized into experimental group and control group with 23 cases in each group. Both groups received routine therapy. Additional robot-assisted therapy was provided to the experimental group, and additional repetitive movement training was provided to the control group, 30 minutes a day, 5 days a week for 12 weeks. Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Limb (FM-UL), modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and modified Barthel index (MBI) were used to assess the motor function of the upper limbs and hands, the muscular tension of elbow, and activities of daily living (ADL) before and after treatment. Results After treatment, the scores of FM-UA, MAS and MBI improved in both groups (t〉3.856, Z〉1,889, P〈0,05), and the scores of FM-UA and MAS were better in the experiment group than in the control group (t=-2.386, Z= 2.625, P〈0.05), however, there was no significant difference in the score of MBI between two groups (t=- 1.326, P=0.098). Conclusion Upper limb robot-assisted therapy can facilitate the recovery of the motor function of upper limbs in acute stroke patient.
出处 《中国康复理论与实践》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第6期688-692,共5页 Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
关键词 脑卒中 机器人 康复 运动功能 上肢 stroke robot rehabilitation motor function upper limb
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Sarti C, Rastenyte D, Cepaitis Z, et al. International trends in mortality from stroke, 1968 to 1994 [J]. Stroke, 2000, 31(7): 1588-1601.
  • 2Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ahmed S, et al. Disablement following stroke [J]. Disabl Rehabli, 1999, 21(5-6): 258-268.
  • 3Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Lindeman E. Understanding the pattern of func- tional recovery after stroke: facts and theories [J]. Restor Neurol Neuro- sci, 2004, 22: 281-299.
  • 4French B, Thomas LH, Leathley MJ, et al. Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2007(4): CD006073.
  • 5Legg L, Pollock A, Langhorne P, et al. A multidisciplinary research agenda for stroke rehabilitation [J]. Br J Ther Rehabil, 2000, 7:319-324.
  • 6Carel C, Loubinoux I, Thilman AF. Neural substrate for the effects of passive training on sensorimtoor cortical representation: a study with functional magnetic resonance imaging in healthy subjects [J]. Cerebr Blood Flow Metab, 2000, 20(3): 478-484.
  • 7Mima T, Sadato N, Yazawa S, et al. Brain structures related to active and passive finger movements in man [J]. Brain, 1999, 122(Pt 10): 1989-1997.
  • 8Murphy TH, Corbett D. Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behavior [J]. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2009, 10(12): 861-872.
  • 9Levin MF, Kleim JA, Wolf SL. What do motor "recovery" and "compen- sation" mean in patients following stroke? [J]. Neurorehabil Neural Re- pair, 2009, 23(4): 313-319.
  • 10Norouzi-Gheidari N, Archambault PS, Fung J. Effects of robot-assist- ed therapy on stroke rehabilitation in upper limbs: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature [J]. J Rehabil Res Dev, 2012, 49(4): 479-496.

二级参考文献9

  • 1邢亮,刘丽旭,顾越,张锋,张通.肌电触发神经肌肉电刺激对脑卒中后上肢运动功能的影响[J].中国康复理论与实践,2013,19(10):949-952. 被引量:15
  • 2Zariffa J, Kapadia N, Kramer JLK, et al. Feasibility and efficacy of upper limb robotic rehabilitation in a subacute cervical spinal cord injury population [ J ]. Spinal cord, 2012,50(3) : 220-226.
  • 3Iehikawa A, Yamamoto H, Ono I, et al. Stimulus-related 20-Hz activity of human cortex modulated by the way of presenting hand actions[J]. Neurosci Res, 2007,58 (3) : 285-290.
  • 4Diserens K,Perret N, Chatelain S, et al. The effect of re- petitive arm cycling on post stroke spasticity and motor control: repetitive arm cycling and spasticity[J]. J Neurol Set, 2007,253 (1-2) : 18-24.
  • 5Rudhe C, Albisser U, Starkey ML, et al. Reliability of movement workspace measurements in a passive arm or- thosis used in spinal cord injury rehabilitation[J]. Journal and rehabilitation, 2012,9 (1) : 37-39.
  • 6Colomer C, Baldovi A, Torrome S, et al. Efficacy of Anneo Spring during the chronic phase of stroke Study in mild to moderate cases of hemiparesis [ J ]. Neurologia (Barcelona, Spain), 2013,28(5) : 261-267.
  • 7Gijbels D, Lmers I, Kerkhofs L, et al. The Armeo Spring as training tool to improve upper limb functionality in multi- ple sclerosis: a pilot study[J]. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2011,8(1) : 5-5.
  • 8Merlo A, Longhi M, Giannotti E, et al. Upper limb evalua- tion with robotic exoskeletor. Normative values for indi- ces of accuracy, speed and smoothness[J] . NeuroReha- bilitation, 2013,33 (4) : 523-530.
  • 9陈金,敖丽娟,杨菲菲,李咏梅.计算机辅助上肢训练对脑卒中患者与正常人脑可塑性影响的功能磁共振成像对比研究[J].中国康复医学杂志,2013,28(11):990-995. 被引量:8

共引文献33017

同被引文献217

引证文献24

二级引证文献171

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部