期刊文献+

首次剖宫产行腹壁中线纵切与腹壁横切对术后并发症及再次剖宫产的影响 被引量:9

Effect of Abdominal Midline Longitudinal Section and Abdominal Transection in Treatment of the First Cesarean Section on the Postoperative Complications and Repeat Cesarean Section
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对首次剖宫产行腹壁中线纵切与腹壁横切对术后并发症及再次剖宫产的影响进行探讨。方法方便选取2013年1月—2014年8月该院行再次剖宫产术的产妇90例,按照产妇首次剖宫产腹壁切口的不同将产妇分为观察组和对照组。观察组产妇首次剖宫产行腹壁中线纵切口,对照组产妇首次剖宫产行腹壁横切。探讨首次剖宫产切口选择对产妇再次行剖宫产术的影响。结果观察组产妇术后瘢痕发生率为42.22%,腹腔粘连发生率为17.78%,对照组产妇术后瘢痕发生率为80%,腹腔粘连发生率为46.67%,观察组产妇并发症发生情况显著低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组产妇再次剖宫产时,包括手术时间、术中出血量在内的各项手术指标均优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论产妇在首次剖宫产时采取腹壁中线纵切的方法,可以有效减少并发症的发生率、提高再次剖宫产的质量和安全性。 Objective To discuss the effect of abdominal midline longitudinal section and abdominal transection in treat- ment of the first cesarean section on the postoperative complications and repeat cesarean section. Methods 90 cases of puerperas receiving the repeat cesarean section in our hospital from January 2013 to August 2014 were selected and divided into two groups according to the different abdominal incisions of puerperas in the first cesarean section, the observation group were given abdominal midline longitudinal section in the first cesarean section, the control group were given abdomi- nal transection in the first cesarean section, the effect of the choice of incision in the first cesarean section on the repeat cesarean section of puerperas was discussed. Results The incidence rates of the postoperative scars and abdominal adhesion were respectively 42.22% and 17.78% in the observation group and 80% and 46.67% in the control group, the occurrence of complications in the observation group was obviously lower than that in the control group, (P〈0.05), the various operative indexes including the operation time and intraoperative blood loss in the observation group were better than those in the control group in the repeat cesarean section, (P〈0.05). Conclusion The method of abdominal midline longitudinal section in the first cesarean section can effectively reduce the incidence rate of complications and improve the quality and security of the repeat cesarean section.
作者 刘瑞敏
出处 《中外医疗》 2016年第9期84-85,共2页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词 首次剖宫产 纵切 横切 影响 First cesarean section Longitudinal section Transection Effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献45

  • 1赵宏,崔健君.剖宫产术中子宫切开至胎儿娩出间隔对新生儿的影响[J].中华妇产科杂志,1993,28(2):67-69. 被引量:149
  • 2马彦彦,祝新利,董悦,王艳琴,郑之敏,张荣君,许艳,赵娟娟.不同术式剖宫产术后二次开腹手术时盆腹腔粘连情况比较[J].中华妇产科杂志,2005,40(11):729-731. 被引量:62
  • 3蓝雪琴.再次新式剖宫产术87例临床分析[J].现代妇产科进展,2006,15(5):395-395. 被引量:9
  • 4李春梅,张明豫,贾怡,杨宇,张静岫.562例剖宫产产后出血原因分析[J].重庆医学,2006,35(19):1786-1788. 被引量:11
  • 5Sunds AL- Took, Robert P, Togas T. Adhesion -related small -bowel obstruchion after gynecotogic operations. Am J obsret Gynecol, 1999, 180 (2): 313.
  • 6Baskett TF,Calder AA,Arulkumaran S.产科手术学[M].11版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:25-26.86.
  • 7Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gulmezoglu AM, et al. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia..the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08[J]. Lancet,2010,375(9713) :490-499.
  • 8Pirkola J, Vaarasmaki M, Leinonen E, et al. Maternal type 1 and gestational diabetes:postnatal differences in insulin secretion in offspring at preschool age[J]. Pediatr Diabe- tes,2008,9(6) :583-589.
  • 9Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM. The association of placenta previa with history of cesarean delivery and a- bortion : a metaanalysis [J ]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1997, 177(5) : 1071-1078.
  • 10Grobman WA, Gersnoviez R, Landon MB, et al. Pregnancy outcomes for women with placenta previa in relation to the number of prior cesarean deliveries[J]. Obstet Gyne- col, 2007,110 (6): 1249-1255.

共引文献181

同被引文献56

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部