摘要
跨太平洋伙伴关系协定制定了一系列超越国际条约及我国相关立法水平的版权刑事保护规则,具体体现为:著作权犯罪的入罪门槛、刑事制裁对象、对间接侵权的刑事制裁以及告诉方式一律为公诉。相比而言,我国著作权犯罪的入罪门槛较高,刑事制裁的具体对象与TPP不同,网络服务提供者的间接侵权尚无法受刑法规制,且告诉方式为公诉与自诉相结合。对此,我国应当立足本国国情,不盲目遵从TPP的超高标准,同时也要适应TPP的部分发展趋势,包括完善入罪门槛,并将网络服务提供者的间接侵权行为独立成罪。
The trans- pacific partnership has formulated a series of treaties on protection of copyright rules beyond international and relevant legislation of our country criminal rules,the concrete manifestation is: the copyright crime of criminalizing threshold,criminal sanctions,the indirect infringement of criminal sanctions and telling way is all by prosecution. Copyright crime in our country,by contrast,criminalizing threshold is higher,the specific object of criminal sanctions is different from the TPP,network service providers of indirect infringement is not affected by criminal law,and telling way is the combination of public prosecution and private prosecution. To this,our country should be based on its national conditions,not blindly follow the TPP super standard,but also to adapt to the part of the development trend of the TPP,including perfecting the threshold into sin,indirect infringement and network service providers into crime independently.
出处
《河南司法警官职业学院学报》
2016年第2期47-50,共4页
Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College
关键词
TPP版权刑事保护
立法差异
应对策略
TPP criminal copyright protection
differences of the legislation
coping strategies