期刊文献+

剖宫产至凶险型前置胎盘的临床治疗分析 被引量:1

Analysis of Clinical Treatment of Pernicious Placenta Previa Caused by Caesarean Section
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的整理该院剖宫产至凶险型前置胎盘孕产妇的临床治疗资料,探讨剖宫产至凶险型前置胎盘孕产妇的治疗效果。方法整群选取该院2014年1月—2015年1月收治的48例剖宫产至凶险型前置胎盘孕产妇,将其作为研究组,另选48例普通前置胎盘孕产妇作为对照组,比较两组孕产妇的产后出血量以及子宫切除率。结果研究组孕产妇出现胎盘粘连率为60.41%,对比组孕产妇出现胎盘粘连率为33.33%,两组患者的胎盘粘连发病率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论剖宫产至凶险型前置胎盘的发病率较低,在术后出血量上明显的高于普通前置胎盘,对出现凶险型前置胎盘的孕产妇宜进行子宫全切治疗,以保证孕产妇的生命安全。 Objective To discuss the treatment effect of pregnant women with pernicious placenta previa caused by caesarean section by sorting out the clinical treatment data of them. Methods 48 cases of pregnant women with pernicious placenta previa caused by caesarean section admitted and treated in our hospital from January 2014 to January 2015 were selected as the research group, 48 cases of pregnant women with common placenta previa were selected as the control group, and the postpartum hemorrhage volumes and hysterectomy rates were compared between the two groups. Results The difference in the morbidity of adherent placenta between the research group and the control group was obvious with statistical significance,(60.41% vs 33.33%), P〈0.05. Conclusion The morbidity of pernicious placenta previa caused by caesarean section is lower, and the postoperative hemorrhage volume of it is obviously higher than that of common placenta previa, and we had better treat the pregnant women with pernicious placenta previa caused by caesarean section by total hysterectomy in order to ensure the life safety of them.
作者 裴英桂
出处 《中外医疗》 2016年第12期87-88,共2页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词 剖宫产至凶险型前置胎盘 子宫全切 普通前置胎盘 疗效比较 Pernicious placenta previa caused by caesarean section Total hysterectomy Common placenta previa Comparison of curative effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献61

  • 1陈志芳,丁岩,赵蕾,韩英,艾星子.B超监测下宫腔镜电切治疗胎盘植入18例临床分析[J].中国内镜杂志,2008,14(12):1299-1300. 被引量:2
  • 2段涛.产后失血性休克诊断及处置的四字方针[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2006,22(11):803-804. 被引量:47
  • 3应豪,阮晟鸣,王德芬.胎盘植入的诊治进展[J].实用妇产科杂志,2007,23(6):335-336. 被引量:243
  • 4谢幸,苟文丽,等.妇产科学[M].第8版,人民卫生出版社,2013,3:75.
  • 5谢幸,苟文丽.妇产科学[M].8版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:126.
  • 6Chattopadhyay SK, Kharif H, Sherbeeni MM. Placenta previa and accrete after previous cesarean section [ J ]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reorod Biol. 1993,52(3 ) :151-156.
  • 7Sivan E, Spira M, Achiron R, et al. Prophylactic pelvic artery cathe- terization and embolization in women : 1 with placenta accreta : can it prevent cesarean hysterectomy [ J ]. Am J Perinatd, 2010,27 ( 6 ) : 455 -461.
  • 8Yang Q, Wen SW, Oppenheimer L, et al. Association of caesarean delivery for first birth with placenta praevia and placental abruption in secondpregnancy [ J ]. B JOG,2007,114 ( 5 ) :609-613.
  • 9Te-Yao Hsu. Abnormal invasive plaeentationg-placenta previa inpe- creta and percreta [ J ]. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol, 2009,48 ( 1 ) : 1 - 2.
  • 10Lawrence 0, Anthony A, Dan F et al. SOGC clinicalpractice guide- line. Diagnosis and management of placentaprevia [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can,2007,29 ( 3 ) :261-266.

共引文献154

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部