期刊文献+

不同血栓抽吸方法治疗急性ST段抬高心肌梗死的比较

Comparison of Different Methods of Thrombus Aspiration in the Treatment of Acute ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同血栓抽吸方法治疗急性ST段抬高心肌梗死的临床疗效。方法随机选取2011—2015年在该院就诊的90例急性ST段抬高心肌梗死患者作为研究的对象给患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)在手术中采用抽吸导管抽吸血栓。所有患者在手术中使用手动抽吸导管,并将患者使用抽吸方式的不同分为3个小组:A组(单独Diver抽吸导管抽吸)、B组(单独Export抽吸导管抽吸)和C组(两种导管组合),每组各30例患者,比较3组患者血流分级(TIMI)以及治疗半年后心血管并发症的发生率。结果经皮冠状动脉介入术中3组患者的血流分级0级的患者C组患者5例,占16.7%,其余各组在术前和术后血流分级差异无统计学意义,P>0.05。结论血栓抽吸导管组合的方式治疗急性ST段抬高心肌梗死患者不能有效的降低患者的发病率。 Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of different thrombus aspiration method for treatment of acute ST elevation myocardial infarction. Methods Randomly selected in 2011 to 2015 in our hospital 90 patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction patients as the object of study to patients with percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI)in surgery using suction catheter suction vampire suppository. All patients in surgery using manual aspiration catheter and patients using suction were divided into three groups: group A(separate diver suction aspiration catheter), group B(separate export aspiration catheter aspiration) and group C(two catheter combined), each group each 30 patients, 3 groups were compared with flow grade(TIMI) and half a year after treatment of cardiovascular complications incidence. Results Percutaneous coronary intervention in the 3 groups of patients with grade 0 blood flow in patients with C group of 5 patients, accounting for 16.7%, the rest of the group before and after the blood flow classification no significant difference, P〈0.05.Conclusion Thrombus aspiration catheter combination treatment in patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction patients can not effectively reduce the incidence of patients.
出处 《中外医疗》 2016年第17期36-37,40,共3页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词 急性ST段抬高心肌梗死 血管抽吸 效果 Acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction Vascular suction Effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献64

  • 1Xiu-Hua Wang,Ling-Zhi Dou,Can Gu,Xiao-Qing Wang.Plasma levels of omentin-1 and visfatin in senile patients with coronary heart disease and heart failure[J].Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine,2014,7(1):55-62. 被引量:38
  • 2颜红兵,朱小玲,艾辉,李南,高海,王健,李响,叶明,迟云鹏,张晓江.急性前壁心肌梗死应用DiverCE抽吸导管的有效性:TAPAFAMI试验[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2007,15(3):145-148. 被引量:13
  • 3O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. 2013 ACCF/ AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc, 2013,82 ( 1 ) : E1-27.
  • 4Piana RN,Paik GY, Mt)scueci M, et al. Incidence and treatment o{ ' no-re{low' a{ter pereutaneous coronary intervention [J].Circulation, 1994,89 (6) :2514-2518.
  • 5Vlaar PJ,Svilaas T, van der Horst IC, et al. Cardiac death and reinfarction after 1 year in the Thrombus Aspiration during Percutaneous coronary intervention in Acute myocardial infarction Study (TAPAS) : a 1 year follow-up study [J].Lancet, 2008,371 (9628) :1915-1920.
  • 6RezkaIla SH, Kloner RA. No-reflow phenomenon [J]. Circulation,2002,105(5) :656-662.
  • 7Sardella G, Mancone M, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, et al. Thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention improves myocardial reperfusion and reduces infarct size[J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2009,53 (4) : 309-315.
  • 8Mongeon FP, B6lisle P, Joseph L, et al. Adjunctive thrombectomy for acute myocardial infarction: a Bayesian meta-analysis[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2010,3 ( 1 ) : 6-16.
  • 9Tamhane UU,Chetcuti S, Hameed 1,et al. Safety and efficacy of thrombectomy in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST elevation MI: a recta- analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. BMC Cardiovasc Disord, 2010,10 : 10.
  • 10De Luca G, Navarese EP, Suryapranata H. A meta-analytic overview of thrombectomy during primary angioplasty[J]. Int J Cardiol,2013,166( 3 ) :606-612.

共引文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部