单“U”缝合术治疗宫颈机能不全

Single “U” Suture in the Treatment of Cervical Incompetence

目的比较改良单"U"缝合及强生缝合线单"U"缝合两种方式的效果及妊娠结局。方法针对采用改良单"U"缝合及强生缝合线单"U"缝合,两种方法,对比了两种缝合方式的有效性,随机选32例符合条件的宫颈机能不全病例随机分为两组。结果两组流产率、早产率、足月产率、两组缝合方法的有效率、延长孕周的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。而出血量差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论两种缝合方法对于宫颈机能不全的治疗均有效,除术中出血量外且均无明显差异。

Objective To compare the improved single ＂U＂ suture and Johnson johnson sutures ＂U＂ stitching effect and pregnancy outcomes of two ways. Methods in this paper, in view of the improved single ＂U＂ suture and Johnson johnson sutures ＂U＂ suture, two methods, comparing the effectiveness of the two types of stitching, randomly selected 32 cases of cervical insufficiency were randomly divided into two groups. Results Two groups of miscarriage, premature birth rate, term production rate, two groups of suture method is efficient and extend gestational age differences had no statistical significance（P0.05）. And the bleeding was statistically significant difference（P0.05）. Conclusion Two methods of suture are effective in the treatment of cervical insufficiency, in addition to the intraoperative blood loss and had no obvious difference.