摘要
结构主义叙事学注重文本整体性与内部要素的关系研究,而米勒正是从这一维度出发试图进行文学的解构。但作为文学自身的拆解与颠覆方式,解构主义又难以与结构主义真正实现二元对立,这种矛盾性思维在《解读叙事》中得到有效地传达。从《解读叙事》出发,就反逻各斯中心主义与叙事文本的线条维度阐释文学的解构与文本未定性表现,进而从更深远的范围内看到米勒在对形式主义的继承与超越过程中所陷入的矛盾心态。
Structuralism narrative focuses on the integrity of the text and studies on the relationship among the internal elements of the text. However, J Hillis Miller attempts to deconstruct the literature just from this perspective. As a way to disassemble and subvert the literature itself, deconstruction also cannot truly achieve the binary opposition with structuralism. This kind of contradiction thought has effectively conveyed through Interpretation of the narrative. Starting from the interpretation of narrative, in terms of Logos centralism and the line of narrative text dimension, we are to interpret the deconstruction of literature and the performances of the text uncertainty. Furthermore, we can see he is in ambivalence in the process of inheritance and transcendence of formalism from a more profound perspective.
出处
《辽宁工程技术大学学报(社会科学版)》
2016年第2期213-217,共5页
Journal of Liaoning Technical University(Social Science Edition)
关键词
解构
结构
米勒
《解读叙事》
文本未定性
deconstruction
construction
J.Hillis Miller
Interpretation of the narrative
the text uncertainty.