期刊文献+

强震复发概率模型中的参数不确定性研究 被引量:2

Parameter uncertainty analysis on probability model of strong earthquake recurrence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在强震发生概率计算过程中,往往只考虑参数的随机不确定性,却很少考虑参数的认知不确定性.本文以布朗过程时间(BPT)模型为例,利用贝叶斯估计法定量分析了强震平均复发间隔的认知不确定性;研究了在强震发生概率计算过程中如何考虑这种认知不确定性.结果表明:采用不同的强震复发间隔参数估计方法,所得的参数认知不确定性存在明显差异;在计算强震发生概率时,是否考虑参数认知不确定性所得的结果存在较大差异. In the process of calculating probability for large earthquake occur- rence, traditional methods often only consider aleatory uncertainty, but episte- mic uncertainty is rarely taken into account. This paper takes Brownian passage time (BPT) model as an example, epistemic uncertainty of mean recurrence interval of large earthquakes is analyzed quantitatively by using Bayesian estimation method, and bow to take epistemic uncertainty into the calculation of the occurrence probability of large earthquake is also studied. The results show that there is significant difference in parameter uncertainty among different methods for determining mean recurrence interval of large earthquakes, also there is remarkable difference between the results with and without considering the epistemic uncertainty of parameters in the process of calculating the probability for large earthquake occurrence.
作者 郭星 潘华
出处 《地震学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第2期298-306,共9页 Acta Seismologica Sinica
基金 国家科技支撑项目(2012BAK15B01-08)资助
关键词 强震发生概率 参数不确定性 随机不确定性 认知不确定性 probability for large earthquake occurrence parameter uncertainty aleatory u ncertainty epistemic uncertainty
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献26

  • 1郑文俊,袁道阳,何文贵.祁连山东段天桥沟-黄羊川断裂古地震活动习性研究[J].地震地质,2004,26(4):645-657. 被引量:30
  • 2刘静,汪良谋.运用活断层资料评价汾渭地震带中长期强震危险性[J].地震学报,1996,18(4):427-436. 被引量:10
  • 3Atwater B F, Hemphill-Haley E. 1997. Recurrence Intervals for Great Earthquakes of the Past 3500 Years at North eastern Willapa Bay[R]. Washington= U S Geological Survey Professional Paper 1576= 108.
  • 4Biasi G, We[don R J. 1998. Paleoseismic date refinement and implications for seismic hazard estimation[M]//Dating and Earthquakes : Review of Quaternary Geochronology and Its Application to Paleoseismology. U S Nuclear Regulato- ry Commission, NURGE-5562: 3 61-3 66.
  • 5Ellsworth W L, Matthews M V, Nadeau R M, Nishenko S P, Reasenberg P A, Simpson R W. 1999. A Physically Based Earthquake Recurrence Model for Estimation of Long-Term Earthquake Probabilities [R]. U S Geological Survey Open-File Report: 99-522.
  • 6Ishibashi K, Satake K. 1998. Problems on forecasting great earthquakes in the subduction zones around Japan by means of paleoseismology[J]. J Seismol Soc Japan, 50(Suppl): 1-21.
  • 7Matthews M V, Ellsworth W L, Reasenberg P A. 2002. A Brownian model for recurrent earthquakes[J]. Bull Seismol SocAm, 92(6) : 2233-2250.
  • 8McCalpin J P, Nishenko S P. 1996. Holocene paleoseismieity, temporal clustering, and probabilities of future large (/V/: 7) earthquakes on the Wasateh fault zone, UtahEJ]. J Geophys Res, 101(B3) : 6233-6253.
  • 9Nishenko S P, Buland R A. 1987. A generic recurrence interval distribution for earthquake forecasting[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am, 77(4) : 1382-1399.
  • 10Pantosti D, Schwartz D P, Valensise G. 1993. Paleoseismology along the 1980 surface rupture of the Irpinia fault z Impli- cations for earthquake recurrence in the southern Apennines, Italy[J]. J Geophys Res, 98(B4) : 6561-6577.

共引文献4

同被引文献113

引证文献2

二级引证文献105

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部