供应链交互作用对牛鞭效应的影响分析被引量：3

the Impact of Supply Chain Interactions on the Bullwhip Effect

下载PDF

导出

摘要考虑两平行供应链系统,建立了需求依赖于两种产品价格的需求函数模型,分析了平行供应链交互作用对牛鞭效应的影响。研究表明:(1)供应链交互作用可能增加或减弱牛鞭效应。(2)对于具有产品可替代性的两竞争型供应链系统,若产品价格交互敏感性不强,则较大协方差的引入可以抑制牛鞭效应。(3)对于具有产品互补性的两合作型供应链系统,若产品价格交互敏感性较强,则较小协方差的引入可以抑制牛鞭效应。 Considering two-parallel supply chains, this paper studies the demand model that depends on two prod- uct prices and analyses the impact of interactions on the bullwhip effect in two-parallel supply chains. The results reveal that：（1）The interactions between the two supply chains may increase or dampen the bullwhip effect. （2） When the two-parallel supply chains are competitors due to product substitutability, if the product in one supply chain has a small interacting price sensitivity coefficient, then the interaction can dampen the bullwhip effect when the price evolution covarianee between the two supply chains is large. （3） When the two-parallel supply chains are partners or their products are complementary, if the product in one supply chain has a large absolute interacting price sensitivity coefficient, then the interaction can dampen the bullwhip effect when the price evolution covariance between the two supply chains is small.

作者孙永权白雪莲马云高王能民

机构地区西安交通大学管理学院过程控制与效率工程教育部重点实验室国网能源研究院

出处《运筹与管理》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第3期39-45,共7页 Operations Research and Management Science

基金国家自然科学基金资助项目(70602017 70971105 71071126) 国家社会科学基金重大项目(1282D070) 陕西省自然科学基础研究计划项目(2010JM9003) 国家博士后基金项目(2013M532024)

关键词供应链管理牛鞭效应平行供应链交互作用价格敏感 supply chain management bullwhip effect parallel supply chains interaction price-sensitive

分类号 F253.4 [经济管理—国民经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献20

1Lee H L, Padmanabhan V, Whang S. The bullwhip effect in supply chains[ J ]. Sloan Management Review, 1997, 35(3): 93-102.
2Lee H L, Padmanabhan V, Whang S. Information distor- tion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect[ J]. Manage- ment Science, 1997, 43(4) : 546-558.
3Forrester J W. Industrial dynamics: a major breakthrough for decision makers [ J ]. Harvard Business Review, 1958, 36(4): 37-66.
4Sterman J D. Modeling managerial behavior: mispereeptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment [ J]. Management Science, 1989, 35(3) : 321-339.
5Chen F, Drezner Z, Ryan J K, et al. Quantifying thebullwhip effect in a simple supply chain: the impact of forecasting, lead times, and information [ J]. Manage- ment Science, 2000, 46(3) : 436-443.
6Chen F, Ryan J K, Simchi-Levi D. The impact of expo- nential smoothing forecasts on the bullwhip effect [ J ]. Naval Research Logistics 2000, 47 (4) : 269-286.
7Zhang X L. The impact of forecasting methods on the bullwhip effect [J].International Journal of Production Economics, 2004, 88( 1 ) : 15-27.
8Alwan L C, Liu J J, Yao D Q. Stochastic characterization of upstream demand processes in a supply chain[J]. liE Transactions, 2003, 35 ( 3 ) : 207-219.
9Ma Y, Wang N, Che A, et al. The bullwhip effect on product orders and inventory: a perspective of demand forecasting techniques [ J ]. International Journal of Production Research, 2013, 51 (1) : 281-302.
10Ma Y, Wang N, Che A, et al. The bullwhip effect un- der different information-sharing settings: a perspective on price-sensitive demand that incorporates price dynam- ics [ J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2013, 51(10) : 3085-3116.