我国区域科技创新政策的系统性分类——基于中关村数据的研究被引量：13

China's Regional Science and Technology Innovation Policy:A Systemic Classification Based on Data from Zhongguancun Science Park

原文传递

导出

摘要以中关村国家自主创新示范区数据为例,采用文本挖掘方法对区域科技创新政策的分类进行系统分析。实证结果表明区域科技创新政策可分为权威型、指导型、紧迫型及阶段型,并通过功能类型、作用强度、资源供给、金额力度及持续效力对比分析了不同类型区域科技创新政策的特点。最后,提出了局限性及下一步研究方向。 In this paper, we use text mining to analyze the classification and of regional science and technology innovation policy based on data obtained from Zhongguancun Science Park. The empirical results indicate that regional science and technology innovation policy can be divided into four types： authoritative, guiding,urgent and periodical. A comparative analysis with function type, intensity, resource supply, funding level and funding effectiveness are performed to investigate the different types of regional science and technology innovation policy. Additionally, the study＇ s limitations are discussed, and future research directions are proposed.

作者张永安耿喆王燕妮

机构地区北京工业大学经济与管理学院清华大学公共管理学院

出处《系统科学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期92-95,共4页 Chinese Journal of Systems Science

基金国家自然科学基金(70972115) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金(14YJC630035) 北京市教委社科重点项目(SZ201510005001)

关键词区域科技创新政策系统性分类文本挖掘对比分析 Regional science and technology innovation policy systemic classification text mining contrastive analysis

分类号 N949 [自然科学总论—系统科学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献11

1Heijs ,J. , Freerider Behaviour and the Public Finance of R&D Activi- ties in Enterprises: the Case of the Spanish Low Interest Credits for R&D[J]. Research Policy,2003,32(3) :445-461.
2Teubal, M. , What is the Systems Perspective to Innovation and Tech- nology Policy(ITP) and How Can we Apply It to Developing and Newly Industrialized Economies? [J]. Journal OF Evolutionary Eco-nomies,2002. 12(1) : 233-257.
3李晨光,张永安.集群创新科技政策“效用—响应”测度分类研究[J].中国科技论坛,2012(10):24-30. 被引量：10
4Dawid, H. and M. Neugart, Agent-based Models for Economic Policy Design[J]. Eastern Economic Journal ,2011,37 ( 1 ) :44-50.
5Rush,H. ,B. J. and H. M. ,Assessing the Technological Capabili- ties of Firms: Developing a Policy Tool [J]. R&D Management, 2012,37 ( 3 ) :221-236.
6Dan Breznitza, A. Z. , The limits of capital : Transcending the Public Financer - private Producer Split in Industrial R&D [J]. Research Policy,2010(39) :301-312.
7Morosini, P. , Industrial Clusters, Knowledge Integration and Perform- ance[J]. World Development,2004,32(2):305-306.
8Bataille, C. , et al. Towards General Equilibrium in a Technology-rich Model with Empirically Estimated Behavioral Parameters. Hybrid Modeling of Energy-Environment Policies: Reconciling Bottom-Up and Top-Down[J]. Special Issue of The Energy Journal, 2006 : 93- 112.
9Onishi, A., A New Challenge to Economic Science:Global Modal Simulation [J]. Journal of Policy Modeling,2010 (32) : 1 46.
10周锐,李爽.科技政策因素对中小企业创新影响的实证分析[J].统计与决策,2011,27(5):186-188. 被引量：7

二级参考文献36

1刘恒江,陈继祥.国外产业集群政策研究综述[J].外国经济与管理,2004,26(11):36-43. 被引量：51
2陈剑锋.基于产业集群的政策研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2005,26(5):60-63. 被引量：20
3山东省统计局.山东统计年鉴2009[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2009.
4Jean-Jacques Salomon.Science Policy Studies and the Development of Science Policy,in Science,Technology and Society[J].A Cross-Disciplinary Presective.ED.,1978, (45-46).
5古扎拉蒂林少宫译.计量经济学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2000..
6Nelson, Richard R. , Katherine Nelson. Technology, institutions and innovation systems [ J ]. Research Policy, 2002,31 ( 2 ) : 265 - 272.
7Birkland, Thomas A. , Regina G. Lawrence. The social and political meaning of the Exxon Valdez oil spill[ J ]. Spill Science & Tech- nology Bulletin, 2002,7 ( 1 - 2) : 17 - 22.
8Smith, Kevin B. Typologies, taxonomies, and the benefits of policy classification [ J ]. Policy Studies Journal. 2002,30 ( 3 ) : 379 - 395.
9Todt, Oliver, Jose Luis Lujan. A new social contract for technology? On the policy dynamics of uncertainty [ J ]. Journal of Risk Re- search. 2008,11 (4) :509 - 523.
10Kaiser, Robert, Heiko Prange. Managing diversity in a system of multi-level governance:the open method of co-ordination in innova- tion policy[ J]. Journal of European Public Policy ,2004,11 (2) :249 -266.