期刊文献+

富血小板血浆关节内注射治疗膝骨关节炎的前瞻性随机对照研究 被引量:31

Intra-articular injection of platelet-rich plasma for treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察富血小板血浆(PRP)治疗膝骨关节炎(KOA)的临床疗效,评估年龄、体重指数和KOA严重程度等对PRP疗效的影响。方法采用前瞻性随机对照研究方法选取2013年12月-2014年11月100例KOA患者,其中男28例,女72例;年龄35~85岁,平均58.0岁。其中退行性关节炎68例,创伤性关节炎32例。Kellgren—Lawrence(K—L)分级Ⅰ级35例,Ⅱ级46例,Ⅲ级19例。通过随机数字表法按1:1分为玻璃酸钠组(HA组,50例)和PRP组(50例),两组年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、K—L分级等差异均无统计学意义。HA组膝关节内注射HA,PRP组注射PRP,各每周1次,连续3周。根据西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)、视觉模拟评分(VAS)和软骨损伤评分系统(CaLs)对两组患者治疗前后的临床表现和MRI上骨异常信号和软骨损伤面积进行比较。随访时患者的WOMAC评分下降≥36%则被认为治疗有效。结果100例患者治疗后均获得6个月随访。PRP组3次治疗结束后和随访6个月时的有效率分别为84%(42例)和60%(30例),而HA组分别为68%(34例)和36%(18例)(P〉0.05,〈0.05)。PRP组的VAS及两组的WOMAC评分较治疗前均有显著改善(P〈0.01),而HA组的VAS与治疗前比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。PRP组内K—L分级Ⅱ级的患者,治疗后平均VAS和平均WOMAC评分高于I级的患者(P〈0.05);Ⅲ级的患者,治疗后平均WOMAC评分高于Ⅱ级的患者(p〈0.05)。针对PRP组内7例患者膝关节MRI的研究显示,治疗前后CaLs差异无统计学意义(P〈0.05),但在1例患者的MRI上观察到软骨下骨异常信号面积缩小和软骨损伤面积减少等征象。随访显示,PRP组年龄、K—L分级与随访疗效呈负相关(P〈0.05),与BMI无明确相关性(P〉0.05)。随着随访时间的延长,PRP和HA的疗效均呈逐渐下降趋势。结论关节内注射PRP治疗KOA具有减轻疼痛、减少炎症反应、促进组织修复的作用,在低年龄段和低K—L分级的患者中疗效更加显著,而BMI对于PRP疗效无明确相关性。 Objective To study the clinical efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and evaluate whether the age, body mass index and grade of KOA are associated with the treatment outcomes. Methods Using the prospective, randomized, controlled study, 100 KOA patients hospitalized between December 2013 and November 2014 were enrolled. Twenty- eight patients were men and 72 were women. Mean age was 58 years ( range, 35-85 years). Degenerative arthritis occurred in 68 patients and traumatic arthritis in 32 patients. Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) score was grade Ⅱ in 35 patients, grade Ⅱ in 46 and grade Ⅲ in 19. The patients were assigned to receive hyaluronic acid (HA) (HA group, n = 50 ) and PRP (PRP group, n = 50 ) by an intraartieular route once weekly for 3 weeks, according to the random number table. Between-group differences were insignificant in age, gender, body mass index (BMI) and K-L grade. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) , visual analog scale (VAS) and cartilage lesions score (CaLs) were used for clinical and MRI evaluations. At follow-up evaluation, the effective rate was defined at least 36% improvement from the baseline WOMAC score. Results All patients were followed up for 6 months. The effective rate in PRP group was 84% versus 68% in HA group after the last treatment (P 〉 0. 05 ), and was 60% versus 36% in HA group at the final follow-up (P 〈 0.05 ). WOMAC score in both groups had significant improvement after operation, while VAS improved only in PRP group ( P 〈 0. 01 ). In PRP group patients with K-L grade Ⅰ had better VAS and WOMAC scores than those with grade 11 (P 〈 0.05 ), and patients with grade Ⅱ had better WOAMC score than those with grade m ( P 〈 0. 05 ). MRI findings showed seven patients in PRP group had similar CaLs before and after operation ( P 〉 0. 05 ) , and the area of abnormal signal in subchondral bone and the depth of cartilage lesion gradually decreased in one of them. Follow-up study showed the outcomes had negative correlation with age and K-L grade ( P 〈 0.05 ), but no certain correlation with BMI in PRP group ( P 〉 0.05 ). Clinical effects in both groups were decreased over time. Conclusions Intraarticular injection of PRP benefits to pain relief, decreased inflammation and tissue repair, and has much better outcome in patients with younger age and lower K-L grade. However, BMI is not associated with the outcome.
出处 《中华创伤杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第7期626-631,共6页 Chinese Journal of Trauma
基金 基金项目:国家卫生计生委科研基金-浙江省医药卫生重大科技计划(省部共建项目)(201487674) 国家自然科学基金(81373669) 浙江省科技厅重大专项(2012C13017-2)
关键词 富血小板血浆 骨关节炎 软骨 Platelet-rich plasma Knee Osteoarthritis Cartilage
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1顾海峰,毕擎,孟可馨,曹力,赵晨,章水均.关节镜下360°去神经化治疗膝关节骨关节炎85例[J].中华创伤杂志,2014,30(6):555-559. 被引量:27
  • 2Gobbi A, Lad D, Karnatzikos G. The effects of repeated intra- articular PRP injections on clinical outcomes of early osteoarthritis of the knee[J]. Knee Snrg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2014, 23 (8) :2170-2177. DOI:I0. 1007/s00167-014-2987-4.
  • 3Filardo G, Kon E, Buda R, et al. Platelet-rich plasma intra- articular knee injections for the treatment of degenerative cartilage lesions and osteoarthritis [ J]. Knee Surg Sports Tranmatol Arthrosc, 2011, 19 (4):528-535. DOI:10. 1007/s00167-010-123845.
  • 4Kon E, Buda R, Filardo G, et al. Platelet-rich plasma: intra- articular knee injections produced favorable results on degenerative cartilage lesions [ J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2010, 18 (4) :472-479. DOI : 10. 1007/s00167-009-0940-8.
  • 5Hochberg MC, Altman RD, Brandt KD, et al. Guidelines for the medical management of osteoarthritis. Part II. Osteoarthritis of the knee. American College of Rheumatology [ J ]. Arthritis Rheum, 1995, 38 ( 11 ) : 1541-1546.
  • 6Kell~'en JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteoarthrosis[ J ]. Ann Rheum Dis, 1957, 16(4):494-502.
  • 7Alizai H, Virayavanich W, Joseph GB, et al. Cartilage lesion score : comparison of a quantitative assessment score with established semiquantitative MR scoring systems [J].Radiology, 2014, 271 (2) :479-487. DOI : 10.1148/radiol. 13122056.
  • 8Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, et al. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee [ J]. JRheumatol, 1988, 15 ( 12 ) : 1833-1840.
  • 9Kooistra BW, Spraque S, Bhandari M, et al. Outcomes assess- ment in fracture healing trials : a primer [ J ]. J Orthop Trauma, 2010, 24 Suppl 1 :$71-$75. DOI:10. 1097/BOT.0b013e3181ca3flM.
  • 10Goldsmith CH, Boers M, Bombardier C, et al. Criteria for clinically important changes in outcomes : development, scoring and evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis patient and trial profiles. OMERACT Committee[J]. J Rheumatol, 1993, 20(3) :561-565.

二级参考文献16

  • 1Felson DT, Naimark A, Anderson J, et al. The prevalence of knee Osteoarthritis in the elderly. The Framingham Osteoarthritis Study[J]. Arthritis Rheum, 1987, 30(8 ) :914 - 918.
  • 2Ronn K, Reischl N, Gautier E, et al. Current surgical treatment of knee osteoarthritis[ J]. Arthritis, 2011, 2011:454873.
  • 3Shin CS, Lee JH. Arthroscopic Treatment for Osteoarthritic Knee[Jl. Knee Surg Relat Res, 2012, 24(4) :187 -192.
  • 4Oliveria SA, Felson DT, Reed iT, et al. Incidence of symptomat- ic hand, hip, and knee osteoarthritis among patients in a heath maintenance organization [ J]. Arthritis Rheum, 1995, 38 (8) : 1134 -1141.
  • 5Anderson DD, Chubinskaya S, Guilak F, et al. Post - traumatic ostearthritis: improved unde~tanding and opportunities for early intervention[ J ]. J Orthop Res, 2011, 29 (6) :802 - 809.
  • 6Fond J, Rodin D, Ahmad S, et al. Arthroscopic debridement for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: 2 - and 5 - year results [ J ]. Arthroscopy. 2002, 18 (8) :829 - 834.
  • 7Spahn G, Hofmann GO, Klinger HM. The effects of arthroscopic joint debridement in the knee osteoarthritis : resuhs of a meta - a- nalysis[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2013,21 (7): 1553 - 1561.
  • 8Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Matheny LM, et al. Ten - year survi- vorship after knee arthroscopy in patients with Kellgren - Lawrence grade 3 and grade 4 osteoarthritis of the knee [ J ]. Arthroscopy. 2013, 29(2) :220 -225.
  • 9Moseley JB, O' Malley K, Petersen N J, et al. A controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee [ J ]. N Engl J Med, 2002 , 347(2):81 -88.
  • 10Potts A, Harrast JJ, Hamer CD, et al. Practice patterns for ar- throscopy of osteoarthritis of the knee in the United States [ J]. Am J Sports Med, 2012, 40(6) :1247 - 1251.

共引文献26

同被引文献259

引证文献31

二级引证文献560

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部