期刊文献+

宫腔镜联合清宫术治疗内生型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠32例临床分析 被引量:59

Clinical analysis on hysteroscope and suction curettage for treatment for endogenous cesarean scar pregnancy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨宫腔镜检查联合清宫术治疗内生型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(CSP)的临床应用价值。方法回顾广州市妇女儿童医疗中心2014年11月至2016年3月经阴道超声诊断为内生型CSP患者32例,应用宫腔镜检查联合清宫术或清宫术加宫腔内球囊压迫治疗,评估阴道超声诊断的符合率、手术时间、术中出血量、术后血β-人绒毛膜促性腺激素(β-HCG)下降的情况以及月经恢复的时间,同时观察不同孕周、血β-HCG水平及瘢痕厚度对手术时间及术中出血量的影响。结果经宫腔镜检查4例患者妊娠囊着床在宫颈内口后壁或侧后壁,排除瘢痕妊娠,超声误诊率为12.5%,符合率为87.5%。28例CSP均1次手术成功,无手术并发症。手术时间(29.57±9.86)min,术中出血量(28.75±14.18)m L。停经天数<49 d与≥49 d相比,手术时间明显缩短(P<0.01),术中出血量明显减少(P<0.05)。血β-HCG<20 k U/L者与≥20 k U/L相比,手术时间和术中出血量两组之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。瘢痕厚度<3.0 mm与≥3.0 mm相比,手术时间及术中出血量两者之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后第1天血β-HCG较术前均下降≥50%,术后28 d内血β-HCG均降至正常。月经来潮平均在术后(36.50±4.99)d,超声检查宫腔内无组织物残留。结论宫腔镜检查联合清宫术治疗内生型CSP具有出血少、操作简单、成功率高、并发症少、住院时间短、费用低等优点。 Objective To investigate clinical application value of hysteroscopy and suction curettage in the treatment of endogenous cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP). Methods A retrospective evaluation of 32 patients who were diagnosed as endogenous CSP by transvaginal ultrasound were treated by hysteroscopy and suction curettage with or without placement of a uterine Foley balloon from November 2014 to March 2016 in our hospital. Diagnosis coincidence rate of transvaginal ultrasound, operative time, amount of intraoperative blood loss, decreasing β-HCG level and resumed menstruation were evaluated. We also observed the operation time and amount of bleeding in the corresponding group categorized according to different gestational weeks, β-HCG level and myometrial thickness respectively. Results 4 patients were excluded CPS by hysteroscopy. Ultrasound misdiagnosis rate of CPS was 12.5%. The 28 patients were diagnosed CPS by hysteroscopy were operated successfully without any complication. The mean operation time was 29.57±9.86 min , and the mean blood loss was 28.75±14.18 mL. There were significant difference of the operation time and amount of bleeding between the menopause ≤ 49 days and 〉 49 days, and between serum β-HCG 〈 20 kU/L and serum β-HCG≥20 kU/L respectively. There were no significant difference between group whose myometrial thickness was 〈 3.0 mm and ≥3.0 mm. The HCG level of the first day after operation was deceased more than 50% in all the patients and became negative 28 days later. The average time resumed menstruation after operation was 36.50±4.99 days. There was no residue by repeated ultrasound examination. Conclusions Hysteroscopy and suction curettage for endogenous CSP has advantages of less bleeding, simple performance, high suc cess rate, less complications, shorter hospitalization time and lower expense.
出处 《中国实用妇科与产科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第7期693-696,共4页 Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics
关键词 宫腔镜 瘢痕妊娠 清宫术 阴道超声 hysteroscopy cesarean scar pregnancy suction curettage transvaginal ultrasound
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1无,左文莉(整理),于晓兰(整理).剖宫产瘢痕妊娠诊断与治疗共识[J].中华医学杂志,2012,92(25):1731-1733. 被引量:263
  • 2Goldin PA, Bassil S, Donnez J. An ectopic pregnancy develop- ing in a previous caesarean section scar[J].Fertil Steril, 1997,67 (2):398-400.
  • 3Vial Y, Petignat P, Hohtfeld P. Pregnancy in a cesarean scar[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2000,16(6):592-593.
  • 4Menacker F, Hamilton BE. Recent trends in cesarean delive~7 in the United States[J]. NCHS Date Brief,2010,3(35):1-8.
  • 5向阳.关于剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的分型与治疗方法的选择[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2012,13(6):401-404. 被引量:150
  • 6Kanat-Pektas M, Bodur S, Dundar O, et al. Systematic review: What is the best first-line approach for cesarean section ectopic pregnancy?[J]. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol,2016,55(2):263-269.
  • 7Li Y, Wang W, Yang T, eta]. Incorporating uterine artery emboli- zation in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy following di- agnostic uhrasonography[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2016, 8 [Epub ahead of print]:.
  • 8Ko JK, Li RH, Cheung VY. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a 10-year experience[J]. Aust N Z J Obestet Gynaecol,2015,55(1):64-69.
  • 9Song D, Liu Y, Xiao Y, et al. A matched cohort study comparing the outcome of intrauterine adhesiolysis for Asherman~s syn- drome after uterine artery embolization or surgical trauma[J]. J Minim Invasive Gvnecol,2014,21 (6): 1022-1028.

二级参考文献29

  • 1金力,范光升,郎景和.剖宫产术后瘢痕妊娠的早期诊断与治疗[J].生殖与避孕,2005,25(10):630-634. 被引量:243
  • 2任彤,赵峻,万希润,刘欣燕,冯凤芝,向阳.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的诊断及处理[J].现代妇产科进展,2007,16(6):433-436. 被引量:169
  • 3Fylstra DL, Pound-Chang T, Miller MG, et al. Ectopic pregnancy within a Caesarean delivery scar: a case report. Am J Obstet Gynecol , 2002,187:302-304.
  • 4Ash A, Smith A, Maxwell D. Caesarean scar pregnancy. B JOG, 2007, 114: 253-263.
  • 5Vial Y, Petignat P. Pregnancy in a cesarean scar. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2000,16:592-593.
  • 6Maymon R, Halperin R, Mendlovic S, et al. Ectopic pregnancies in a caesarean scar: review of the medical approach to an iatrogenic complication. Hum Repred Update, 2004, 10: 515- 523.
  • 7Maymon R, Halperin R, Mendlovic, et al. Ectopic pregnancy in caesarean section scars: the 8 year experience of one medical center. Hum Reprod,2004 ,19 :278-284.
  • 8Wang WM, Long WQ, Yu QH. Complication of cesarean section : pregnancy on the cicatrix of a previous Cesarean section. Chin Med J,2002,115:242-246.
  • 9Bih-Chwen Hsieh, Jiann-Loung Hwang, Hum-shan Pan, et al. Heterotopic Caesarean scar pregnancy combined with intrauterine pregnancy successfully treated with embryo aspiration for selected embryo reduction : case report. Hum Reprod ,2004,19:285-287.
  • 10Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B, et al. First- trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment cesarean section scar. Ultrasound Ob- stet Gynecol, 2003, 21: 220-227.

共引文献384

同被引文献452

引证文献59

二级引证文献389

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部