4PISINARAS V, PETALAS C, GIKAS G D, et al. Hydro- logical and Water Quality Modeling in a Medium-sized Basin Using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) [J~. Desalination, 2010, 250(1):274-286.
5CHAPLOT V. Impact of DEM Mesh Size and Soil Map Scale on SWAT Runoff, Sediment, and NO3-N Loads Pre- dictions [ J ]. Journal of Hydrology, 2005, 312 ( 1 - 4) : 207 - 222.
6ROMANOWICZ A A, VANCLOOSTER M, ROUNSEV- ELL M, et al. Sensitivity of the SWAT Model to the Soil and Land Use Data Parametrisation: A Case Study in the Thyle Catchment, Belgium [ J ]. Ecological Modeling, 2005, 187(1) : 27 -39.
7WU K S, JOHNSTON C A. Hydrologic Response to Cli- matic Variability in a Great Lakes Watershed: A Case Study with the SWAT Model [ J ]. Journal of Hydrology, 2007, 337(1 -2) : 187 -199.
8FICKLIN D L, LUO Y Z, LUEDELING E, et al. Cli-mate Change Sensitivity Assessment of a Highly Agricul- tural Watershed Using SWAT[ J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2009, 374(1 -2) : 16 -29.
9SONG L R, ZHANG J Y. Hydrological Response to Cli- mate Change in Beijiang River Basin Based on the SWAT Model[ J]. Procedia Engineering, 2012, 28 : 241 - 245.
10CHENXL , BAO S , LI H , et al. LUCC Impact on Sediment Loads in Subtropical Rainy Areas [ J ]. Photo- grammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 2007, 73(3) : 319 -327.
