片面共犯的机能性解读--以间接正犯为视角展开

On Clarifying One-Side Accomplice: From Perspective of Indirect Guilt

片面共犯理论的基石并非行为共同说。行为共同说只是不要求在认定共同犯罪时先对行为加以"定型",并非不要求行为人对共同行为存在"意思联络",因此,行为共同说不能为片面共犯提供基础。现有理论对于片面共犯的存废讨论流于表面,仅立足于概念本身,鲜有涉及制度价值层面的探讨。片面共犯是间接正犯的替补概念,间接正犯无法解决的问题,可以基于可罚性认定为片面共犯加以处罚。间接正犯的理论存在替补角色、支配说、实行行为说之聚讼,片面共犯必须在间接正犯特定理论的层面上加以理解。

The base of one-side accomplice is not the theory of Joint Action. Because according to the theory of Joint Action, when determining joint crime, it is not necessary to ＂stereotype＂ the act first, but it does require the intentional connection of actors. Current discussion on one-side accomplice is only based on the concept, not the system. One-side accomplice is the alternative of indirect guilt. Some problems can＇t be understood as an indirect guilt can be understood as a one-side accomplice. Indirect guilt combines the theory of Alternative Character, the theory of Dominance and the theory of Act of Perpetrating. One-side accomplice should be comprehended from the theories of indirect guilt.