摘要
对恐怖主义犯罪的调查程序面临着保障国家安全与保障公民个人权利、行政权与司法权、实体正义与程序正义的价值冲突,在立法和司法实践中必须对以上三种冲突予以平衡。尤其要重视为过度构建保障国家安全而导致行政调查权力的扩张滥用、实体正义凌驾于程序正义之上,以及忽略司法权对人权保障的救济机制等问题的出现。
The procedure of investigating terrorism crime faces conflicts between protecting national security and protecting citizens' personal rights, between administrative power and judicial power, between substantive justice and procedural justice, which need to be balanced in the legislative and judicial practice. More attention should be paid to administrative investigation power abuse, substantive justice superior to procedural justice and the ignorance of judicial power to protect human rights caused by excessively protect national security.
出处
《北京政法职业学院学报》
2016年第2期65-69,共5页
Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law
关键词
《反恐怖主义法》
调查程序
保障人权
"Anti Terrorism Law"
investigation procedure
protecting human rights