期刊文献+

Differences and relations of objectives, constraints, and decision parameters in the optimization of individual heat exchangers and thermal systems 被引量:3

Differences and relations of objectives, constraints, and decision parameters in the optimization of individual heat exchangers and thermal systems
原文传递
导出
摘要 Performance improvement of heat exchangers and the corresponding thermal systems benefits energy conservation, which is a multi-parameters, multi-objectives and multi-levels optimization problem. However, the optimized results of heat exchangers with improper decision parameters or objectives do not contribute and even against thermal system performance improvement. After deducing the inherent overall relations between the decision parameters and designing requirements for a typical heat exchanger network and by applying the Lagrange multiplier method, several different optimization equation sets are derived, the solutions of which offer the optimal decision parameters corresponding to different specific optimization objectives, respectively. Comparison of the optimized results clarifies that it should take the whole system, rather than individual heat exchangers, into account to optimize the fluid heat capacity rates and the heat transfer areas to minimize the total heat transfer area, the total heat capacity rate or the total entropy generation rate, while increasing the heat transfer coefficients of individual heat exchangers with different given heat capacity rates benefits the system performance. Besides, different objectives result in different optimization results due to their different intentions, and thus the optimization objectives should be chosen reasonably based on practical applications, where the inherent overall physical constraints of decision parameters are necessary and essential to be built in advance. Performance improvement of heat exchangers and the corresponding thermal systems benefits energy conservation, which is a multi-parameters, multi-objectives and multi-levels optimization problem. However, the optimized results of heat exchangers with improper decision parameters or objectives do not contribute and even against thermal system performance improvement. After deducing the inherent overall relations between the decision parameters and designing requirements for a typical heat exchanger network and by applying the Lagrange multiplier method, several different optimization equation sets are derived, the solutions of which offer the optimal decision parameters corresponding to different specific optimization objectives, respectively. Comparison of the optimized results clarifies that it should take the whole system, rather than individual heat exchangers, into account to optimize the fluid heat capacity rates and the heat transfer areas to minimize the total heat transfer area, the total heat capacity rate or the total entropy generation rate, while increasing the heat transfer coefficients of individual heat exchangers with different given heat capacity rates benefits the system performance. Besides, different objectives result in different optimization results due to their different intentions, and thus the optimization objectives should be chosen reasonably based on practical applications, where the inherent overall physical constraints of decision parameters are necessary and essential to be built in advance.
出处 《Science China(Technological Sciences)》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2016年第7期1071-1079,共9页 中国科学(技术科学英文版)
基金 supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant Nos.51422603,51356001&51321002) the National Basic Research Program of China("973"Project)(Grant No.2013CB228301)
关键词 优化问题 决策参数 热系统 换热器 拉格朗日乘子法 性能改进 优化目标 传热面积 energy conservation thermal system physical constraint decision parameter optimization objectives
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1Bergman T L, Lavine A S, Incropera F P, et al. Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer. 7th ed. Hoboken: John wiley & Sons, 2011.
  • 2Shah R K. Advances in science and technology of compact heat ex- changers. Heat Transfer Eng, 2006, 27:3-22.
  • 3Shah R K, Sekulid D P. Fundamentals of Heat Exchanger Design. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2003.
  • 4Xie G N, Sunden B, Wang Q W. Optimization of compact heat ex- changers by a genetic algorithm. Appl Therm Eng, 2008, 28: 895-906.
  • 5Brito F P, Martins J, Hancer E, et al. Thermoelectric exhaust heat re- covery with heat pipe-based thermal control. J Electron Mater, 2015, 44:1984-1997.
  • 6Ordonez J C, Bejan A. Entropy generation minimization in paral-lel-plates counterflow heat exchangers. Int J Energ Res, 2000, 24: 843-864.
  • 7Salimpour M R, Bahrami Z. Thermodynamic analysis and optimiza- tion of air-cooled heat exchangers. Heat Mass Transfer, 2011, 47: 35-44.
  • 8Pussoli B F, Barbosa J R, da Silva L W, et al. Optimization of pe- ripheral finned-tube evaporators using entropy generation minimiza- tion. Int J Heat Mass Tran, 2012, 55:7838-7846.
  • 9Zhang L N, Yang C X, Zhou J H. A distributed parameter model and its application in optimizing the plate-fin heat exchanger based on the minimum entropy generation. Int J Therm Sci, 2010, 49:1427-1436.
  • 10Satapathy A K. Thermodynamic optimization of a coiled tube heat exchanger under constant wall heat flux condition. Energy, 2009, 34: 1122-1126.

同被引文献20

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部