期刊文献+

围封对荒漠草原土壤微生物数量及其酶活性的影响 被引量:17

Effects of Enclosure on Soil Microbial Quantity and Enzyme Activity in Desert Steppe
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以鄂尔多斯高原温性荒漠草原为对象,对比研究了放牧和围封条件对草原植物地下生物量、土壤有机质、土壤微生物数量及酶活性的影响,旨在为干旱区退化草地的恢复与重建提供科学依据。结果表明,(1)与放牧区相比,围封显著增加了表层土壤(0-10 cm)草地植物地下生物量23.81%,极显著增加了次表层土壤(10-20 cm)草地植物地下生物量37.21%,而对土壤有机质含量无显著影响。(2)围封极显著提高了表层土壤真菌种群数量71%,次表层土壤细菌种群数量147%,显著提高了底层土壤(20-40 cm)真菌164%和表层、次表层土壤放线菌种群数量56%和8.9%。(3)围封区的次表层土壤脲酶活性显著增加了31.13%,表层土壤蔗糖酶活性显著降低了24.14%,表层土壤过氧化氢酶和碱性磷酸酶活性分别显著提高了16.59%和11.76%。(4)围封与放牧条件下,各指标相关性表现不尽一致;放牧条件下,放线菌种群数量与各指标相关性均不显著(P〉0.05),而在围封下,放线菌与真菌种群数量及碱性磷酸酶活性无显著相关性(P〉0.05),与其他指标均表现出显著(P〈0.05)或极显著(P〈0.01)正相关关系,相关系数达68%以上;放牧条件下,真菌种群数量与4种土壤酶活性均呈极显著(P〈0.01)正相关关系,相关系数在84%以上,而围封条件下,其与4种酶活性均呈显著正相关关系(P〈0.05)。 This study conducted on aStipa breviflora dominated temperate desert steppe in Ordos plateaus, a comparative studied the impacts of grazing and enclosure on belowground standing biomass, soil organic matter, soil microbial quantity and enzyme activity. Objective of this study was to provide a scientific basis for the recovery and reconstruction of degraded grassland in arid areas. The key findings are, (1) Compared with the grazing area, enclosure significantly increased 23.81% and 37.21% grassland belowground standing biomass in the surface soil (0-10 cm) and in the subsurface soil (10-20 cm), respectively, while it had no significant effect on soil organic matter content. (2) Enclosure significantly improved 71% fungi population in soil surface and 147% bacterial population in subsurface, and also significantly increased 164% fungi population in underlying soil layer (20-40 cm) and 56% and 8.9% actinomycetes population in soil surface and in subsurface, respectively. (3) Enclosure significantly increased 31.13% urease activity in the subsurface soil, decreased 24.14% sucrose activity in the surface soil, and improved 16.59% catalase activity and 11.76% alkaline phosphatase activity in the surface soil. And (4) it was not consistent of the correlation between enclosure and grazing on different indexes, showing that the actinomycetes population was no significant correlation among different indexes under grazing treatment (P〉0.05), while with the exception of no significant correlation between actinomycetes and fungi population with alkaline phosphatase activity under the enclosure (P〉0.05), the other indexes showed significant (P〈0.05) or very significant (P〈0.01) positive correlation relationship with more than 68% correlation coefficient. In addition, the fungi population had a very significantly (P〈0.01) positive correlation with four kinds of soil enzyme activity under the grazing condition, and the correlation coefficient is above 84%. And it was a significant positive correlation between the fungi population and four soil enzyme activity under the enclosure (P〈0.05).
出处 《生态环境学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第5期760-767,共8页 Ecology and Environmental Sciences
基金 公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201003061)
关键词 荒漠草原 土壤地下生物量 土壤有机质 微生物数量 土壤酶活性 desert steppe belowground biomass soil organic matter microorganism population soil enzyme activity
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1COLLINS S L, SMITH M D. 2005. Scale-dependent interaction of fire andgrazing on community heterogeneity in tall grass prairie [J]. Ecology,87(8): 2058-2067.
  • 2DICK R P. 1994. Soil enzyme activities as indicators of soil quality [C]//DORAN J W, COLEMAN D C, BEZDICEK D F, et al. Defining SoilQuality for a Sustainable Environment [J]. Soil Science, 159(1): 7.
  • 3HOBBS N T, SCHIMEL D S, OWENSBY C E. 1991. Fire and grazing inthe tall grass prairie: contingent effects on nitrogen budgets [J].Ecology, 72(4): 1374-1382.
  • 4JENKINSON D S, LADD J N. 1981. Microbial biomass in soil:Measurement and turnover [A]//Paul V E A, Ladd J N. SoilBiochemistry [M]. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.
  • 5MOKANY K, RAISON R J, PROKUSHKIN A S. 2005. Critical analysis ofroot: shoot ratios in terrestrial biomes [J]. Global Change Biology,12(1): 84-96.
  • 6POWLSON D S, BROOKS P C, CHRISTENSEN B T. 1987. Measurementof soil Microbial biomass provides an early indication of changes intotal soil organic matter due to straw incorporation [J]. Soil Biologyand Biochemistry, 19(2): 159-164.
  • 7陈鸿洋,尚振艳,傅华,张宝林,张斯莲,牛得草.荒漠区不同大小灌丛周围土壤微生物生物量及活性特征[J].草业学报,2015,24(2):70-76. 被引量:18
  • 8陈利军,武志杰,姜勇,周礼恺.与氮转化有关的土壤酶活性对抑制剂施用的响应[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(9):1099-1103. 被引量:77
  • 9程杰,高亚军.云雾山封育草地土壤养分变化特征[J].草地学报,2007,15(3):273-277. 被引量:58
  • 10韩芳,刘朋涛,牛建明,乌兰巴特尔,张庆,张靖.50a来内蒙古荒漠草原气候干燥度的空间分布及其演变特征[J].干旱区研究,2013,30(3):449-456. 被引量:39

二级参考文献439

共引文献1114

同被引文献348

引证文献17

二级引证文献76

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部