期刊文献+

超细经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾和输尿管上段结石的疗效观察(附32例报告) 被引量:84

Ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of renal or upper ureteral stones (report of 32 cases)
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨超细经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾和输尿管上段结石的疗效及安全性.方法 回顾性分析2015年6-10月我院32例行超细经皮肾镜取石术的肾和输尿管上段结石患者的临床资料.其中肾结石29例,输尿管上段结石3例.单发结石21例,多发结石7例,铸型结石4例.结石位于 肾下盏8例,肾盂10例,输尿管上段3例,肾盂合并下盏10例,肾盂合并上盏1例.结石大小10~41 mm,平均(20.1 ±7.6)mm;结石CT值520 ~ 1550Hu,平均(1125.9±225.9) Hu.无肾积水16例,轻度肾积水13例,中度肾积水2例,重度肾积水1例.1例合并重复肾输尿管畸形,1例为腹腔镜下肾盂切开取石术后残留结石.结果 32例均经单通道行超细经皮肾镜取石术.其中,经中盏穿刺9例,经下盏穿刺23例;经第11肋间穿刺4例,经第12肋下穿刺28例.手术时间10 ~ 90min,平均(30.3±15.0)min;术后住院天数1~5d,平均(1.9±1.0)d;血红蛋白下降1~46g/L,平均(14.6±8.4)g/L;术后止痛药的使用率为0.围手术期并发症发生率为3.13% (1/32),1例术中集合系统穿孔,无发热、严重出血、尿外渗、胸膜损伤等并发症发生,无输血病例.术后第1天评估结石清除率为93.75%(30/32),术后1个月为96.88%(31/32).结论 超细经皮肾镜取石术是治疗肾和输尿管上段结石安全、有效的方法,尤其适用于<2 cm肾下盏结石,结石清除率高,微创、术后完全无管化,恢复快,住院时间短,大大提高了患者的生活质量. Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of renal or upper ureteral stones.Methods The data of 32 patients diagnosed as renal or upper ureteral stones were retrospectively reviewed,who underwent ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy from June to October,2015,including 29 kidney stones,3 upper ureteral stones,of which 21 single stone,7 multiple stones,and 4 staghorn stones.There were 8 cases with inferior calyx stones,10 with renal pelvis stones,3 with upper ureteral stones,10 with renal pelvis stones plus inferior calyx stones and 1 with renal pelvis stones plus upper calyx stones.The mean stone size was (20.1 ±7.6) mm (ranging from 10 to 41mm).The mean Hounsfield unit (HU) was (1 125.9 ±225.9) Hu (ranging from 520 to 1 550Hu).In this cohort,13 cases had mild hydronephrosis,2 moderate hydronephrosis,1 severe hydronephrosis while no hydronephrosis identified in the other 16 patients.One case had concomitant kidney and ureter duplication malformation,and 1 case had residual stones after laparoscopic nephrolithotomy.Results All of the patients were treated by single tract UMP.Among them,middle calyceal puncture was performed in 9 cases,and the other 23 cases underwent lower calyceal puncture,including 4 cases of intercostal puncture,and 28 subcostal puncture.The mean operating time was (30.3 ± 15.0) min (ranging from 10 to 90 min).The mean postoperative hospital stay was (1.9 ± 1.0)days (ranging from 1 to 5 days).The mean hemoglobin decrease was(14.6 ±8.4)g/L (ranging from 1 to 46 g/L).No analgesics were used.Peri-operative complication rate was 3.13% (1/32) with 1 case of collection system perforation.There was no fever,severe bleeding,urinary extravasation,pleural injury,or blood transfusion.The SFR was 93.75% (30/32) and 96.88% (31/32) on the first day and the first month after the operation,respectively.Conclusions UMP could be a safe and effective method for the treatment of renal or upper ureteral stones,especially for inferior calyceal stones less than 2cm.It offers high stone clearance rate,minimally invasiveness,quick recovery,short length of hospital stay and improved quality of life.
出处 《中华泌尿外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第6期427-430,共4页 Chinese Journal of Urology
基金 上海市科学技术委员会重点科技攻关项目(11441901100)
关键词 肾结石 输尿管上段结石 超细经皮肾镜取石术 经皮肾镜取石术 Kidney stone Upper ureteral stone Ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1叶利洪,李雨林,李王坚,陈永良,陶水祥,蒋小强,娄纪祥.肾下盏解剖结构对输尿管软镜下钬激光碎石治疗肾下盏结石疗效的影响[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2013,34(1):24-27. 被引量:103
  • 2De S, Autorino R, Kim FJ, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta- analysis[J]. Eur Urol, 2015, 67: 125-137. DOI: 10. 1016/j. eururo. 2014.07. 003.
  • 3Kukreja R, Desai M, Patel S, et al. Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prospective study [J]. J Endourol, 2004, 18:715-722.
  • 4Yamaguchi AI, Skolarikos A, Buehholz NP, et al. Operating times and bleeding complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy : a comparison of tract dilation methods in 5537 patients in the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study[J].J Endourol, 2011, 25: 933-939. DOI: 10. 1089/end. 2010.0606.
  • 5Mishra S,Sharma R, Garg C, et al. Prospective comparative study of miniperc and standard PNL for treatment of 1 to 2 cm size renal stone[J]. BJU Int, 2011, 108: 896-899. DOI: 10. 1111/j. 1464- 410X. 2010. 09936. x.
  • 6Desai 3, Solanki R. Ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UMP): one more armamentarium[J]. BJU Int, 2013, 112: 1046-1049. DOI: 10. llll/bju. 12193.
  • 7Deem S, Defade B, Modak A, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus extraeorporeal sh~k wave lithotripsy for moderate sized kidney stones[Jl. Urology, 2011,78:739-743. DOI: 10. 1016/j. urology. 2011. 04.010.
  • 8Turk C, Petr ik A, Sarica K, et al. EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis[ J]. Ear Urol, 2016,69 : 475-482. DOI : 10. 1016/j. eururo. 2015.07. 041.
  • 9Srivastava A, Chipde SS. Management of 1-2 cm renal stones[ J]. Indian J Urol, 2013 , 29 : 195-199. DOI: 10. 4103/0970-1591. 117280.
  • 10Kiliearslan H, Kaynak Y, Kordan Y, et al. Unfavorable anatomical factors influencing the success of retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole renal calculi [J]. Urol J, 2015, 12 : 2065- 2068.

二级参考文献11

  • 1曾国华,李逊,钟文,袁坚,单炽昌,吴开俊,陈文忠.微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾下盏结石[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2006,27(6):368-370. 被引量:45
  • 2Resorlu B, Oguz U, Resorlu EB, et al. The impact of pelvical- ieeal anatomy on the success of retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with lower pole renal stones. Urology, 2012, 79: 61-66.
  • 3Irwin BH, Desai M. Ureteroscopic superiority to extraeorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of small-to-medium-sized intrarenal non-staghorn calculi. Urology, 2009, 74: 256-258.
  • 4Takazawa R, Kitayama S, Tsujii T. Successful outcome of flexi- ble ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy for renal stones 2 cm or greater. Int J Urol, 2012, 19: 254-267.
  • 5Stay K, Cooper A, Zisman A, et al. Retrograde intrarenal litho- tripsy outcome after failure of shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol, 2003, 170 (6Ptl) : 2198-2201.
  • 6Bercowsky E, Shalhav AL, Elbahnasy AM, et al. The effect of patient position on intrarenal anatomy. J Endourol, 1999, 13: 257 -260.
  • 7Monga M, Weiland D, Pedro RN, et al. Intrarenal manipulation of flexible ureteroseopes: a comparative study. BJU Int, 2007, 100 : 157-159.
  • 8Pasqui F, Dubosq F, Tchala K, et al. Impact on active scope deflection and irrigation flow of all endoscopic working tools dur- ing flexible ureteroscopy. Eur Urol, 2004, 45 : 58-64.
  • 9杨春,高小峰,周铁,彭泳涵,许传亮,王林辉,孙颖浩.输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗合并临床症状的肾盏憩室结石[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2012,33(1):16-18. 被引量:50
  • 10程跃,严泽军,马建伟,袁鹤胜,谢国海,贾晓龙.组合式输尿管软镜联合钬激光治疗肾结石46例报告[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2012,33(1):29-31. 被引量:93

共引文献102

同被引文献515

引证文献84

二级引证文献474

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部