期刊文献+

运用多b值DWI探讨前列腺中央腺体癌的诊断 被引量:7

To Investigate the Diagnosis of Prostate Central Gland Cancer by Multiple B Values DWI
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的运用3.0 T MR多b值DWI探讨b值选择对前列腺中央腺体癌(CGPCa)及良性前列腺增生(BPH)鉴别效能的影响。方法经病理证实的28例CGPCa及23例BPH患者行常规序列及DWI序列扫描,DWI设定4个b值(0、500、1000、1500 s/mm^2),分别选取b=0、1000 s/mm^2,b=0、500、1000 s/mm^2,b=0、1500 s/mm^2,b=0、500、1500 s/mm^2,b=0、1000、1500 s/mm^2,b=0、500、1000、1500 s/mm^2拟合得到ADC图,测量感兴趣区域(ROI)的ADC值。采用两独立样本t检验比较CGPCa组与BPH组ADC值的差异,应用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价不同b值组合的诊断效能。结果 b=0、1000 s/mm^2和b=0、500、1000 s/mm^2两组在CGPCa及BPH组各ROI的ADC值均相等。CGPCa及BPH组在不同b值组合下ADC值差异均有显著统计学意义(P<0.001)。b=0、1000 s/mm^2,b=0、500、1000 s/mm^2,b=0、1500 s/mm^2,b=0、500、1500 s/mm^2,b=0、1000、1500 s/mm^2,b=0、500、1000、1500 s/mm^2的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.912、0.912、0.952、0.950、0.952、0.950;两两比较显示b=0、1500s/mm^2,b=0、1000、1500 s/mm^2,b=0、500、1000、1500 s/mm^2三组分别与b=0、1000 s/mm^2和b=0、500、1000 s/mm^2组的AUC比较差异有统计学意义,P值分别为0.015、0.009、0.015。在b=0、1500 s/mm^2组,当ADC值阈值为0.901×10^(-3)mm^2/s时,诊断CGPCa的敏感性为92.86%,特异性为100%,阳性预测值为100%,阴性预测值为85.2%。结论 b=1500 s/mm^2的高b值DWI对于鉴别CGPCa与BPH具有显著意义,诊断效能优于b=1000 s/mm^2的常规DWI。 Objective To investigate the effect of bvalue on differentiation efficiency of prostate central gland cancer(CGPCa) and benign prostate hyperplasia(BPH) by using multiple bvalues diffusion weighted imaging(DWI).Methods28 cases of PCa and 23 cases of BPHproved by histopathology were examined by routine sequences and DWI pulse sequence.The diffusion bvalues were 0,500,1000 and 1500 s/mm^2.ADC map was fitted by using b = 0,1000 s/mm^2,b =0,500,1000 s/mm^2,b = 0,1500 s/mm^2,b = 0,500,1500 s/mm^2,b = 0,1000,1500 s/mm^2,b = 0,500,1000 and1500 s/mm^2,respectively,and the ADC value in ROI(Region of Interest) was measured.Two-sample t-test was used to compare ADC values between CGPCa and BPH groups.The diagnostic performance of ADC values was evaluated with receiver operating characteristics(ROC).Results ADC(b = 0,1000 s/mm^2) and ADC(b = 0,500,1000 s/mm^2) in any CGPCa and BPH cases was completely equaled.The ADC values from six kinds of b value combinations had statistically significant difference between CGPCa and BPH groups(P 〈0.001).The area under the ROC curve for ADC(b = 0 and 1000 s/mm^2),ADC(b = 0,500 and 1000 s/mm^2),ADC(b = 0 and 1500 s/mm^2),ADC(b = 0,500 and 1500 s/mm^2),ADC(b= 0,1000 and 1500 s/mm^2),ADC(b = 0,500,1000 and 1500 s/mm^2) was 0.912,0.912,0.952,0.950,0.952,0.950,respectively.Comparison of ROC curves shown statistically significance in ADC(b = 0.1000 s/mm^2) or ADC(b = 0,500 and 1000 s/mm^2) with three other combinations including ADC(b = 0,1500 s/mm^2),ADC(b = 0,1000 and 1500 s/mm^2) and ADC(b = 0,500,1000,1500 s/mm^2),P value was 0.015,0.009,0.015,respectively.According to the ROC analysis; when the cutoff value was 0.901×10- 3mm^2/s in the combination of b = 0.1500 s/mm^2,the sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,and negative predictive value of diagnosing CGPCa were 92.86%,100%,100%,85.2%,respectively.Conclusion High b value(b = 1500 s/mm^2) DWI had certain significance in differentiating the CGPCa and BPH,and high b value(b = 1500 s/mm^2) DWI was superior to the conventional DWI(b = 1000 s/mm^2) on diagnosis efficiency.
出处 《临床放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第6期891-896,共6页 Journal of Clinical Radiology
关键词 前列腺中央腺体癌 前列腺增生 扩散加权成像 多b值 Prostate central gland cancer Benign prostate hyperplasia Diffusion weighted imaging Multiple b values
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Schimmoller L, Quentin M, Arsov C,等.以MRI引导下活检为参照的前列腺ESUR评分的一致性研究[J].国际医学放射学杂志,2014,37:91-92.
  • 2Panebianco V, Barchetti F, Manenti G, et al. MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy: technical features and preliminary results[ J]. Radiol Med ,2015,120:571-578.
  • 3Kalmuk J, Folaron M, Buchinger J, et al. Multimodal imaging guided preclinical trials of vascular targeting in prostate cancer[ J]. Oncotarget, 2015,27 : 24376 -24392.
  • 4Baco E, Ukimura O, Rud E, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging- transectal ultrasound image-fusion biopsies accurately characterize the index tumor: correlation with step-sectioned radical prostatecto- my specimens in 135 patients[J]. Eur Urol,2015 ,67 :787-794.
  • 5杨毅,赵文露,卢艳丽,沈钧康.DWI在前列腺癌诊断中的应用进展[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2014,8(14):124-127. 被引量:2
  • 6陆健,王霄英,张学琴,缪小芬,张涛,郭雪梅,李飞宇,刘婧,丁丁,姜吉锋,李玮,蒋学祥.MR扩散加权成像鉴别前列腺中央腺体偶发癌与良性前列腺增生[J].中国医学影像技术,2010,26(10):1926-1929. 被引量:14
  • 7孙美玉,刘爱连,宋清伟,张龙敏,魏强,徐斌.3.0T多b值弥散加权成像在前列腺癌与前列腺增生鉴别诊断中的应用[J].生物医学工程与临床,2013,17(4):349-354. 被引量:6
  • 8Quentin M, Pentang G, Schimmoller L, et al. Feasibility of diffusional kurtosis tensor imaging in prostate MRI for the assessment of prostate cancer : preliminary results[ J ]. Magn Reson Imaging,2014,32:880- 885.
  • 9童竑章,张逸,李强,施优波,陈孟达.高b值DWI结合T_2WI对PSA异常前列腺病变的诊断价值[J].医学影像学杂志,2014,24(2):272-275. 被引量:20
  • 10Tamura C, Shinmoto H, Soga S, et al. Diffusion kurtosis imaging study of prostate cancer: preliminary findings [ J]. J Magn Reson Imaging,2014 ,40:723-729.

二级参考文献82

共引文献70

同被引文献63

引证文献7

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部