摘要
"自身意识"概念具有丰富的内涵,它在哲学语境和日常语境中的意义变化本身就是一部复杂的意义演变史。今天,人们从不同的思想流派出发,基于不同的视角和思路对"自身意识"以及可能产生的相关问题进行了大量的讨论,并且产生了丰硕的成果,也正是在当前的语境之下,给"自身意识是什么"这个基本问题一个回答,这个任务变得尤为迫切。本文试图通过对一些重要的分析哲学家的相关研究进行分析,提取出他们争论的焦点,从而为"自身意识"描绘出一个基本的概观,并且以此来回应霍斯特曼站在德国古典哲学的立场提出的问题,"有一个哲学的自身意识问题吗?"其目的是想要证明,德国古典哲学和分析哲学这两条思路可以在"自身意识"问题上形成有益的互补,从而为哲学的和经验的自身意识的接续提供一种可能的方案。
"Self-Consciousness" is a concept meanings in philosophical and ordinary context is with rich contents, and the development of its complex. Contemporary philosophers in different schools of thought have undertaken many discussions and achieved fruitful results on this theme from different points of view, and in this context, it is necessary to raise and answer the fundamental question " what is the self-consciousness ". In this essay, by analyzing some important analytic philosophers'relevant research, we try to give the question of self-consciousness an overview, and respond to Horstmann's question "Is there a philosophical question of self-consciousness?" raised from classical german Philosophy's perspective. And we also try to demonstrate that classical german philosophy and analytic philosophy are complementary on the question of self-consciousness, and that it is possible to reconcile philosophical self-consciousness and empirical self-consciousness.
出处
《社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第7期129-135,共7页
Journal of Social Sciences
关键词
自身意识
免于误认的错误
理性
Self-Consciousness
Immune to Error Through Misidentification
Reason