国外青少年科学素质测评工具述评被引量：4

A Review of Measuring Tools on Youth's Scientific Literacy

下载PDF

导出

摘要科学教育的目标之一就是培养青少年的科学素质。青少年科学素质的测评成为科学教育研究者和各国教育部门关注的重点。本研究对国际上主流的青少年科学素质测评工具的测评对象、测评内容、测评工具的主要形式等进行了综述与评析,并对我国青少年科学素质测评工具开发提出几点思考,以期为开发出适合我国青少年的科学素质测评工具提供借鉴和参考。 Cultivating youth＇s scientific literacy is one of the most important goals of science education. Therefore, measuring youth＇s scientific literacy becomes the focus of attention of science education researchers and governments. This paper reviews the measuring subjects, the contents, and the tools of major measuring scales and questionnaires. At the end of this paper, we provide several suggestions for the development of measuring tool suitable for China.

作者李秀菊陈玲

机构地区中国科普研究所

出处《外国中小学教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第7期14-18,5,共6页 Primary & Secondary Schooling Abroad

基金中国科普研究所"青少年科学素质测评体系及案例研究"(编号:2016LYE030102)项目成果之一

关键词青少年科学素质测评工具 youth scientific literacy measuring tools

分类号 G632.0 [文化科学—教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献15

1Kathryn Garthwaite, Bey France Gillian Ward (2014) The Complexity of Scientific Literacy: The development and use of a data analysis matrix, International Journal of Science Education, 36:10, 1568-1587.
2Kongju Mun, Namsoo Shin, Hyunju Lee, Sung-Won Rim, Kyunghee Choi, Sung-Youn Choi & Joseph S. Krajcik (2015) Korean Secondary Students' Perception of Scientific Literacy as Global Citizens: Using Global Scientific Literacy Questionnaire, International Journal of Science Education, 37:11, 1739-1766.
3http://www, oecd. org/edu/pisa-2015-assessment- and-analytical-framework 9789264255425-en. htm .
4刘克文,李川.PISA2015科学素养测试内容及特点[J].比较教育研究,2015,37(7):98-106. 被引量：63
5http://timss, bc. edu/.
6夏小俊,顾乃景,柏毅.TIMSS 2015与NAEP 2015科学评估框架的比较研究[J].考试研究,2016,12(1):96-101. 被引量：4
7http://nees, ed. gov/nationsreportcard/.
8Glynn, S. M., & Koballa, T. R ]earn college science (2006) In J J. Mintzes & H. L. William (Eds.), Handbook of college science teaching (pp Arlington, VA: National Science 25- 32). TeachersAssociation Press.
9Manhart, Factor s (Doctoral j. j. (1997). tructure and S gender thesis), p. 12 27. The University of Iowa, Iowa City.
10Laugksch, R. C., & Spargo, P. g. Construction of a paper-and-pencil basic scientific literacy based on literacy aoals recommended by the Association for the Advancement of (1996). test of selected American Science.Public Understanding of Science, 5(4), 331- 359.

二级参考文献15

1Organization for Economic Co-operation and Develop- ment. PISA 2015 Draft Science Framework[ EB/OL ]. http: //www. oecd. org/pisa/pisaproducts/Draft%20PISA%202015 %20Science%20Framework%20. pdf. 2014-03-10. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
2Measuring Student Knowledge and Skills: A New Frame- work for Assessment [ EB/OL ]. http ://www. oecd. org/edu/ school/programmeforinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/336 93997. pdf. 2014-03-10.
3Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. The PISA 2003 Assessment Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science and Problem Solving Knowledge and Skills [EB/OL]. http://www, oecd. org/edu/school/program- dentassessmentpisp/33694881, pdf. 2014-03-10.
4Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Assessing Scientific, Reading and Mathematical Literaey:A Framework for PISA 2006 [EB/OL]. http://www, fmmedu- cacion, com. ar/Sisteduc/Inforrnes/PISA2OO6_alfabetiza- eioncientymatem, pdf. 2014-03-10.
5Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. The PISA 2009 Assessment Framework:Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics and Science [ EB/OL ]. http ://www. oecd. org/pisa/pisaproducts/44455820, pdf. 2014-03-10.
6Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathe- matics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy [ EB/OL ]. http ://www. oecd. org/pisa/pisaproducts/ PISA%202012%20framework%20e-book_final. pdf. 2014- 03-10.
7Leopold E Klopfer. A Structure for the Affective Domain in Relation to Science Education[ J ]. Science Education, 1976, 60(3) :299-312.
8Norman L Webb. Criteria for Alignment of Expectations and Assessments in Mathematics and Science Education [M]. Washington, DC : Council of Chief State School Officers and National Institute for Science, Education Research Mono- graph, 1997.14-32.
9申梓刚.NAEP和TIMSS教育评估体系的比较研究和启示[J].教学月刊（中学版）,2012(2):24-28. 被引量：2
10张雅琪,张军朋.美国NAEP科学探究纸笔测验试题的特点[J].物理教师,2013,34(1):79-81. 被引量：5