摘要
目的调查高中学生回答调查问卷的符合程度,探讨保障调查质量的对策。方法抽查92名高中学生,重新回答20个单选题,予以比较,进行4级评分。结果复测与原测相比,完全一致的比率为74.95%;男生与女生、城市与农村差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05);20题全部符合的、符合题数≥19的、≥18的、≥17的、≥16的、≥15的比率分别为4.35%、13.04%、25.0%、39.13%、56.52%、70.65%;各题目,完全一致率较高(一致率〉80%)的7道,较低(〈70%)的6道,其余7道题介于70%~80%之间;偏离方向上,回答偏好1级、偏差1级的分别占40.35%、36.88%;偏好2级、偏差2级的分别占8.46%、9.11%;偏好≥3级、偏差≥3级的分别占1.95%、3.25%;总评分,评分1级、2级、3级、4级的分别占70.65%、16.30%、6.52%、6.52%。结论高中生的调查问卷,应逐个予以质量评价,剔除30%质量较差的。
Objective To understand the quality of the answer of a questionnaire survey, so as to explore countermeasures for ensuring the quality of questionnaire survey. Methods A total of 92 students of senior high school were surveyed, retested on 20 topics and then compared with the original test. The results were divided into 4 levels. Results The ratio of completely consistent (CC) of the 20 topics was 74.95 %. There were no statistical significances between male and female ( P 〉0.05)and between urban and rural ( P 〉0.05). The ratio of the number of subjects who replied 20 right, ≥ 19,≥18,≥17,≥16 and ≥15 topics was 4.35% ,13.04%,25.00%,39. 13% ,56. 52% and 70.65% (to compare the first and the second test;denominator was 92). There were 7 topics whose CC was above 80 %. There were 6 topics whose CC was below 70% . There were 7 topics whose CC was 70- 80%. The ratio of the second test was better 1,2 and -3 grade than the first test was 40. 3536 and 88 % %, respectively;while the ratio of the second test was worse 1,2 and -3 grade than the first test was 8.46% and 9.11% respectively. The ratio of the scores that were judged level 1,2,3 and 4 was 70.65 % , 16.30 % , 6.52 % and 6.52 % respectively. Conclusion The questionnaires of students from senior high schools should be judged one by one, eliminating 30 % with poor quality.
出处
《预防医学论坛》
2016年第5期324-326,329,共4页
Preventive Medicine Tribune
基金
大连市2012年医药卫生科学技术研究计划项目(编号:2012118)
关键词
调查问卷
质量
学生
Questionnaire
Quality
Students