期刊文献+

不同应力路径下饱和软粘土静力特性试验研究 被引量:3

Stress Path Tests on Saturated Wenzhou Soft Clays
原文传递
导出
摘要 采用英国GDS变围压动三轴系统对温州饱和软粘土分别进行了应力路径斜率η=1/3时不同初始有效固结围压的静力试验和不同应力路径的静力试验,研究了不同条件下温州饱和软粘土的强度特性。试验结果表明,不同初始有效固结围压和不同应力路径的温州饱和软粘土均呈应变硬化规律,且呈非线性;随着初始有效固结围压的增加,土体的强度在增加;应力路径斜率η=1/3时不同初始有效固结围压下,土体所呈现的变化曲线具有相似性。 The Stress path tests on saturated Wenzhou soft clays were conducted on the GDS dynamic triaxial testing system with variable confining pressures. Tests are performed with the slope of the stress path is set to be 1/3 with different initial ef- fective confining stress and with various stress paths. The test results indicate that, the nonlinear strain hardening phenomena can be observed in different initial effective confining pressures and different stress paths. With the increase of initial effective consolidation pressure, the strength of the soft clay increases. Under a stress path slope of 1/3, all soil hardening curves are similar.
出处 《土工基础》 2016年第3期387-390,共4页 Soil Engineering and Foundation
关键词 软粘土 应力路径 静力特性 GDS动三轴 有效固结围压 Soft Clays Stress Path Strength Characterization Dynamic Triaxial Testing Equipment Effective Consolidation Pressure
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1T. W. Lambe. Method of Estimating settlementFJ~. JSMFD, ASCE, vol. 90,SM5,1964.
  • 2LAMBE T W. Stress Path Methed[J-~. Journal of Soil Mechan- nics and Foundation Division,ASCE,1967,93(6) :268-277..
  • 3Feda J. Stress-Path Dependent Shear Strength of Sand~J-~. A- merican Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE, 1994,120(6) ~ 958- 974.
  • 4Tang-Tat Ng. Ultimate State of Samples of Ellipsoids under Different Stress Paths[J-]. J. Eng. Mech. 2008. 134: 723-729.
  • 5Mofiz S A, Islam M N. Modeling and Numerical Analysis of Expansive Soil in Stress Path Tests EJ~. Proceedings of the GeoFlorida 2010 Conference, ASCE, 2010, Section: Soil and Geotechnical System Characterization, 747-756.
  • 6刘祖德,陆士强,杨天林,等.应力路径对填土应力应变关系的影响及其应用[J].岩土工程学报,1982(4):45-55.
  • 7谷川,王军,张婷婷,蔡袁强.应力路径对饱和软黏土割线模量的影响[J].岩土力学,2013,34(12):3394-3402. 被引量:21

二级参考文献26

  • 1袁静,龚晓南.基坑开挖过程中软土性状若干问题的分析[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2001,35(5):465-470. 被引量:38
  • 2刘恩龙,沈珠江.不同应力路径下结构性土的力学特性[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2006,25(10):2058-2064. 被引量:54
  • 3刘国彬,侯学渊.软土的卸荷模量[J].岩土工程学报,1996,18(6):18-23. 被引量:159
  • 4曾国熙 潘秋元.软粘土地基基坑开挖性状的研究[J].岩土工程学报,1988,10(3).
  • 5孙岳崧 濮家骝 等.不同应力路径对砂土应力应变关系的影响[J].岩土工程学报,1987,9(6):79-87.
  • 6刘祖德 等.应力路径对填土应力应变关系的影响及其应用[J].岩土工程学报,1982,4(4):45-55.
  • 7LAMBE T W. Stress Path method[J]. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, ASCE, 1967, 93(6): 268--277.
  • 8LAMBER T W, MARR W A. Stress path method: Second Edition[J]. Journal of the Geotechnieal Engineering Division, ASCE, 1979, 150(6): 727--738.
  • 9NAGARAJ TSMK, SRIDHARAN A. Incremental loading device for stress path and strength testing of soils[J]. Geotechnieal Testing Journal, 1981, 4(2): 456 --467.
  • 10AMOROSI A, CALLISO L, RAMPELLO S. Observed behavior of reconstituted clay along stress paths typical of excavations[C]//Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Pre-failure Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema, 1999.

共引文献20

同被引文献21

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部