期刊文献+

Intravascular Ultrasound Classification of Plaque in Angiographic True Bifurcation Lesions of the Left Main Coronary Artery 被引量:4

Intravascular Ultrasound Classification of Plaque in Angiographic True Bifurcation Lesions of the Left Main Coronary Artery
原文传递
导出
摘要 Background: Accurately, characterizing plaques is critical for selecting the optimal intervention strategy for the left main coronary artery (LMCA) bifurcation. Coronary angiography cannot precisely assess the location or nature of plaques in bifurcation lesions. Few intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) classification scheme has been reported for angiographic imaging of true bifurcation lesions of the unprotected LMCA thus far. In addition, the plaque composition at the bifurcation has not been elucidated. This study aimed to detect plaque composition at LMCA bifurcation lesions by IVUS. Methods: Fifty-eight patients were recruited. The location, concentricity or eccentricity, site of maximum thickness, and composition of plaques of the distal LMCA, ostial left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery and, left circumflex (LCX) coronary artery were assessed using IVUS and described using illustrative diagrams. Results: True bifurcation lesions of the unprotected LMCA were classified into four types: Type A, with continuous involvement from the distal LMCA to the ostial LAD and the ostial LCX with eccentric plaques; Type B, with concentric plaques at the distal LMCA, eccentric plaques at the ostial LAD, and no plaques at the LCX; Type C, with continuous involvement from the distal LMCA to the ostial LCX, with eccentric plaques, and to the ostial LAD, with eccentric plaques; and Type D, with continuous involvement from the distal LMCA to the ostial LAD, with eccentric plaques, and to the ostial LCX, with concentric plaques. The carina was involved in only 3.5% of the plaques. A total of 51.7% of the plaques at the ostium of the LAD were soft, while 44.8% and 44.6% were fibrous in the distal LMCA and in the ostial LCX, respectively. Conclusions: We classified LMCA true bifurcation lesions into four types. The carina was always free from disease. Plaques at the ostial LAD tended to be soft, whereas those at the ostial LCX and the distal LMCA tended to be fibrous. Background: Accurately, characterizing plaques is critical for selecting the optimal intervention strategy for the left main coronary artery (LMCA) bifurcation. Coronary angiography cannot precisely assess the location or nature of plaques in bifurcation lesions. Few intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) classification scheme has been reported for angiographic imaging of true bifurcation lesions of the unprotected LMCA thus far. In addition, the plaque composition at the bifurcation has not been elucidated. This study aimed to detect plaque composition at LMCA bifurcation lesions by IVUS. Methods: Fifty-eight patients were recruited. The location, concentricity or eccentricity, site of maximum thickness, and composition of plaques of the distal LMCA, ostial left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery and, left circumflex (LCX) coronary artery were assessed using IVUS and described using illustrative diagrams. Results: True bifurcation lesions of the unprotected LMCA were classified into four types: Type A, with continuous involvement from the distal LMCA to the ostial LAD and the ostial LCX with eccentric plaques; Type B, with concentric plaques at the distal LMCA, eccentric plaques at the ostial LAD, and no plaques at the LCX; Type C, with continuous involvement from the distal LMCA to the ostial LCX, with eccentric plaques, and to the ostial LAD, with eccentric plaques; and Type D, with continuous involvement from the distal LMCA to the ostial LAD, with eccentric plaques, and to the ostial LCX, with concentric plaques. The carina was involved in only 3.5% of the plaques. A total of 51.7% of the plaques at the ostium of the LAD were soft, while 44.8% and 44.6% were fibrous in the distal LMCA and in the ostial LCX, respectively. Conclusions: We classified LMCA true bifurcation lesions into four types. The carina was always free from disease. Plaques at the ostial LAD tended to be soft, whereas those at the ostial LCX and the distal LMCA tended to be fibrous.
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2016年第13期1538-1543,共6页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
关键词 Intravascular Ultrasound Left Main True Bifurcation Lesion PLAQUE Intravascular Ultrasound Left Main True Bifurcation Lesion Plaque
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Asakura T, Karino T. Flow patterns and spatial distribution of atherosclerotic lesions in human coronary arteries. Circ Res 1990;66:1045-66. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.66.4.1045.
  • 2Kurt M, Tanboga IH, Karakas MF, Biiyiikkaya E, Ak~ay AB, Sen N, et al. Clinical and morpbologica[ evaluation of coronary bifurcation lesions. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars 2013;41:207-11. doi: 10.1016/ S0167-5273(12)70386-8.
  • 3Thompson CA, Sidhu MS, Brown JR~ Sabir SA, Floyd KC, DE Vries JT, et aL Classification and atberosclerosis distribution in patients with left main coronary disease. J lnterv Cardiol 2009;22:431-6. doi: I 0.1111/j. 1540-8183.2009.00490.x.
  • 4Papadopoulou SL, Girasis C, Gijsen F J, Rossi A, Ottema J, van der Oiessen AG, et al. A CT-based Medina classification in coronary bifurcations: Does the lumen assessment provide sufficient information? Catheter Cardiovasc lnterv 2014;84:445-52. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25496.
  • 5Oviedo C, Maehara A, Mintz GS, Araki H, Choi SY, Tsujita K, et al, lntravaseular ultrasound classification of plaque distribution in left main coronary artery biturcations: Where is the Dla~aue reallylocated? Circ Cardiovasc lnterv 2010;3:105-12. doi: 10.1161/ CIRCINTERVENTIONS. 109.906016.
  • 6Hermiller JB, Buller CE, Tenaglia AN, Kisslo KB, Phillips HR, Bashore TM, et al. Unrecognized left main coronary artery disease in patients undergoing interventional procedures. Am J Cardiol 1993;71:173-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90734-T.
  • 7Yakushiji T, Maehara A, Mintz GS, Saito S, Araki H, Oviedo C, et al. An intravascular ultrasound comparison of left anterior descending artery/first diagonal branch versus distal left main coronary artery bifurcation lesions. Eurolntervention 2013;8:1040-6. doi: 10.4244/ E1JVSI9A 160.
  • 8Eshtehardi P, McDaniel MC, Suo J, Dhawan SS, Timmins LH, Binongo JN, et al. Association of coronary wall shear stress with atherosclerotic plaque burden, composition, and distribution in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Heart Assoc 2012;1:e002543. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.002543.
  • 9Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, Bailey SR, Erbel R, Fitzgerald P J, et al. American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of lntravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coil Cardiol 2001;37:1478-92. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01175-5.
  • 10Kim WJ, Kim YH, Park DW, Yun SC, Lee JY, Kang S J, et aL Comparison of single- versus two-stent techniques in treatment of unprotected left main coronary bifurcation disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011 ;77:775-82. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22915.

同被引文献12

引证文献4

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部