期刊文献+

2型糖尿病轻度认知障碍中医证型与认知功能关系初探 被引量:7

Preliminary research on the relationship between TCM syndromes and the cognitive function in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with mild cognitive impairment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨2型糖尿病轻度认知障碍中医证型与认知功能的关系。方法对56例2型糖尿病轻度认知障碍患者进行中医辨证分型,分为实证组和虚证组,实证组包括痰瘀互阻证、肝郁化热证,虚证组包括精髓亏虚证、脾肾两虚证。利用简易精神状态量表(MMSE)和蒙特利尔认知评估量表(Mo CA)评分,比较不同中医证型患者认知功能的差异。结果 MMSE量表评分,实证组与虚证组组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。Mo CA量表评分,虚证组总分、命名和延迟回忆评分均明显低于实证组(P<0.05,P<0.01),其中延迟回忆评分中,虚证组老年和中青年评分均明显低于实证组(P<0.05,P<0.01);命名评分中,虚证组老年评分明显低于实证组(P<0.05),虚证组中青年评分与实证组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论对2型糖尿病轻度认知障碍中医证型的区分,Mo CA量表较MMSE量表更有优势。2型糖尿病轻度认知障碍虚证患者较实证患者延迟回忆能力更低,老年虚证患者命名能力更差。 Objective To investigate the relationship between TCM syndromes and the cognitive function in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Methods 52 patients with T2DM and MCI were classified into excessive syndrome group and deficiency syndrome group, the excessive syndrome group included syndrome of obstruction of phlegm and stagnation, type of liver stagnation transforming into fire, and deficiency syndrome group included syndrome of deficiency of essence and marrow. The neuropsychological tests differences of cognitive function of patients with different syndromes were compared with the scores through Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) were recorded. Results There were no significant statistical differences between excess syndrome group and deficiency syndrome group in MMSE (P 〉 0. 05). But the total scores, nomenclature and delayed recall scores in MoCA of deficiency syndrome group were significantly lower than that of excess syndrome group(P〈0. 05, P 〈0. 01 ). Wherein the delayed recall score, deficiency syndrome group in both older and young were significantly lower than that of excess syndrome group( P 〈 0.05, P 〈 0. 01 ). And in the nomenclature scores, deficiency syndrome group in older were significantly lower than that of excess syndrome group ( P 〈 0. 05), but no significant statistical difference in young (P 〉 0. 05). Conclusion There are some advantages in MoCA compared with MMSE in differentiating TCM syndromes for patients with T2DM and MCI. The patients with T2DM and MCI of deficiency syndrome have much lower delayed recall ability compared with that of excess syndrome. And the older patients with deficiency syndrome have much lower nomenclature capability.
出处 《北京中医药》 2016年第5期415-418,共4页 Beijing Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(81574036) 北京市卫生系统高层次卫生技术人才培养计划项目(2013-2-31) 北京市中西医结合老年疾病研究所专项(2012-191) 北京中医药科技发展资金项目(QN2015-14)
关键词 2型糖尿病 轻度认知障碍 中医证型 简易精神状态量表 蒙特利尔认知评估量表 type 2 dfiabetes mellitus mild cognitive impairment TCM syndromes Mini-Mental State Examination Montreal Cognitive Assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1中国防治认知功能障碍专家共识专家组.中国防治认知功能障碍专家共识[J].中华内科杂志,2006,45(2):171-173. 被引量:561
  • 2Ganguli M, Dodge HH, Shen C, et al. Mild cognitive impairment, amnestic type : an epidemiologic study [ J ]. Neurology ,2004,63 ( 1 ) : 115-121.
  • 3Van den Berg E, Kloppenborg RP, Kessels RP, et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia and obesity: a systematic comparison of their impact on cognition [J]. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2009, 1792: 470-481.
  • 4Alien KV, Frier BM, Strachan MW. The relationship between type 2 diabetes and cognitive dysfunction: longitudinal studies and their methodological limitations [ J]. Eur J Pharmacol,2004,490( l-3 ) : 169-175.
  • 5黄小波,李宗信,陈文强,王宁群.2型糖尿病认知障碍患者的中医证候聚类分析[J].中国中西医结合急救杂志,2009,16(1):11-13. 被引量:20
  • 6Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation [ J]. Diabet Med, 1998,15 ( 7 ) :539-553.
  • 7Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, et al. Mild cognitive impairment; clinical characterization and outcome [ J ]. Arch Neurol, 1999,56 ( 3 ) : 303-308.
  • 8田金洲,时晶,张新卿,毕齐,马辛,王志良,李晓斌,盛树力,李林,吴振云,房立岩,赵晓东,苗迎春,王蓬文,任映,尹军祥,王永炎,无.轻度认知损害临床研究指导原则(草案)[J].中西医结合学报,2008,6(1):9-14. 被引量:92
  • 9国家中医药管理局,中医病证诊断疗效标准[M].南京:南京大学出版社,1995:86.
  • 10国家技术监督局.中医临床诊疗术语证候部分[M].北京:中国标准出版社,1997:30.

二级参考文献88

共引文献1048

同被引文献108

引证文献7

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部