期刊文献+

Henry入路锁定接骨板治疗不稳定型桡骨远端骨折的疗效分析 被引量:9

Volar locking plate for unstable distal radial fractures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨掌侧锁定接骨板治疗不稳定型桡骨远端骨折的临床疗效.方法 回顾分析2011年1月-2014年12月,采用掌侧入路锁定接骨板治疗,并获得半年以上随访的128例不稳定型桡骨远端骨折病例.比较患者术后1个月,3个月,6个月Jakim桡骨远端骨折疗效评分及握力、关节活动度相对健侧的恢复程度.结果 128例在术后3个月内骨折均牢固愈合,无疼痛及严重并发症.术后6个月Jakim评分为优良者达到97%;术后1个月,3个月手部握力、腕关节活动度均较健侧有明显差异(P<0.05);术后6个月后,手部握力、腕关节活动度及功能评分均接近健侧水平(P>0.05),仅前臂旋后功能与健侧差异具有统计学意义(P=0.04),但(54.4±21.9)°的旋后角度仍能满足日常生活需要.结论 对于桡骨远端骨折的治疗稳定性的判断是选择手术与非手术治疗的关键;掌侧入路锁定接骨板固定可用于绝大多数的桡骨远端骨折,并且更为可靠、有效、并发症更小;对于明显移位的尺骨茎突基底骨折应给予切开复位内固定. Objective To evaluate the efficacy of the volar locking plate for unstable distal radial fractures. Methods 128 cases of unstable distal radius fractures were treated with volar locking plates and followed up more than 6 months from Jan 2011 to Dec 2014. Jakim efficacy scores of the distal radius fractures were compared and the grip strength and degree of motion between the healthy side and injured side were compared in 1 week, 1 month and 6months after the operations. Results All the 128 cases of fractures were healed within 4 months after operation, with no pain and serious complications. Rate of excellent and good was 97% measured by Jakim scale 6 months after the operation; the grip strength, wrist joint mobility have difference compared with the healthy side after 1 week and 1 month after the operation (P 〈 0.05). The grip strength, wrist joint mobility were similar to the healthy side after 6 months of the operation (P 〉0.05). Only the angle of forearm supination was statistically different from contralateral side (P = 0.04), but (54.4±21.9)° supination can still meet the needs of daily life. Conclusion The unstable distal radial fractures can be treated effectively using locking plate fixation through volar approach, with little serious complications, the function of the wrist can recover to which before the injury.
出处 《实用手外科杂志》 2016年第2期140-143,共4页 Journal of Practical Hand Surgery
关键词 桡骨远端骨折 掌侧入路 锁定接骨板 Distal radial fractures Volar approach Locking plate
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1盛加根,罗从风,曾炳芳.掌侧锁定加压接骨板(LCP)治疗桡骨远端不稳定骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2005,7(7):657-659. 被引量:50
  • 2Koval K, Haidukewych GT, Service B, et al. Controversies in the Management of Distal Radius Fractures[J].J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2014,22(9):566-575.
  • 3Lang PO, Bickel KD. Distal radius fractures: percutaneous treatment versus open reduction with internal fixation[J].J Hand Surg Am, 2014,39(3):546-548.
  • 4Fowler JR, Ilyas AM. Prospective evaluation of distal radius fractures treated with variable-angle volar locking plates[J].J Hand Surg Am, 2013,38(11):2198-2203.
  • 5陈晓东,王宇仁,王栋梁,蒋雷生,沈雷,姚维芳,周青.锁定钢板治疗桡骨远端粉碎性骨折[J].中华手外科杂志,2006,22(1):13-15. 被引量:27
  • 6Jakim I, Pieterse HS, Sweet MB. External fixation for intra-articular fractures of the distal radius [J].J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1991,73(2):302-306.
  • 7LaMartina J, Jawa A, Stucken C, et al. Predicting alignment after closed reduction and casting of distal radius fractures[J].J Hand Surg Am, 2015,40(5):934-939.
  • 8McCann PA, Clarke D, Amirfeyz R. The cadaveric anatomy of the distal radius: implications for the use of volar plates[J].Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2012,94(2):116-120.
  • 9Karantana A, Downing ND, Forward DP, et al. Surgical treatment of distal radial fractures with a volar locking plate versus conventional percutaneous methods: a randomized controlled trial [J].J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2013,95(19):1737-1744.
  • 10Safdari M, Koohestani MM. Comparing the effect of volar plate fixators and external fixators on outcome of patients with intra-articular distal radius fractures: A clinical trial[J].Electron Physician, 2015,7 (2):1085-1091.

二级参考文献20

共引文献74

同被引文献60

引证文献9

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部