期刊文献+

Clinically available RNA profiling tests of prostate tumors: utility and comparison 被引量:2

Clinically available RNA profiling tests of prostate tumors: utility and comparison
原文传递
导出
摘要 In the postscreening era, physicians are in need of methods to discriminate aggressive from nonaggressive prostate cancer (PCa) to reduce overdiagnosis and overtreatment. However, studies have shown that prognoses (e.g., progression and mortality) differ even among individuals with similar clinical and pathological characteristics. Existing risk classifiers (TMN grading system, Gleason score, etc.) are not accurately enough to represent the biological features of PCa. Using new genomic technologies, novel biomarkers and classifiers have been developed and shown to add value to clinical or pathological risk factors for predicting aggressive disease. Among them, RNA testing (gene expression analysis) is useful because it can not only reflect genetic variations but also reflect epigenetic regulations. Commercially available RNA profiling tests (Oncotype Dx, Prolaris, and Decipher) have demonstrated strong abilities to discriminate PCa with poor prognosis from less aggressive diseases. For instance, these RNA profiling tests can predict disease progression in active surveillance patients or early recurrence after radical treatments. These tests may offer more dependable methods for PCa prognosis prediction to make more accurate and personal medical decisions. In the postscreening era, physicians are in need of methods to discriminate aggressive from nonaggressive prostate cancer (PCa) to reduce overdiagnosis and overtreatment. However, studies have shown that prognoses (e.g., progression and mortality) differ even among individuals with similar clinical and pathological characteristics. Existing risk classifiers (TMN grading system, Gleason score, etc.) are not accurately enough to represent the biological features of PCa. Using new genomic technologies, novel biomarkers and classifiers have been developed and shown to add value to clinical or pathological risk factors for predicting aggressive disease. Among them, RNA testing (gene expression analysis) is useful because it can not only reflect genetic variations but also reflect epigenetic regulations. Commercially available RNA profiling tests (Oncotype Dx, Prolaris, and Decipher) have demonstrated strong abilities to discriminate PCa with poor prognosis from less aggressive diseases. For instance, these RNA profiling tests can predict disease progression in active surveillance patients or early recurrence after radical treatments. These tests may offer more dependable methods for PCa prognosis prediction to make more accurate and personal medical decisions.
出处 《Asian Journal of Andrology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2016年第4期575-579,共5页 亚洲男性学杂志(英文版)
基金 The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81402339).
关键词 precision medicine prostate cancer RNA profiling precision medicine prostate cancer RNA profiling
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Torte LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Feday .I, Lortet-Tieulent J, etal. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA CancerJ Clin 2015; 65: 87-108.
  • 2Strope SA, Andriole GL. Prostate cancer screening: current status and future perspectives. Nat Rev Urol 2010; 7: 487-93.
  • 3Heidenreich A, Bastian P J, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Joniau S, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer, part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013. Eur Urol 2014; 65: 124-37.
  • 4Cooperberg MR, Carroll PR, Klotz L. Active surveillance for prostate cancer: progress and promise. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 3669-76.
  • 5King CR, Long JP. Prostate biopsy grading errors: a sampling problem? Int J Cancer 2000; 90: 326-30.
  • 6Conti SL, Dall'era M, Fradet V, Cowan JE, Simko J, et al. Pathological outcomes of candidates for active surveillance of prostate cancer. J Urol 2009; 181: 1628-33.
  • 7Muntener M, Epstein JI, Hernandez D J, Gonzalgo ML, Mangold L, etal. Prognostic significance of Gleason score discrepancies between needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 767-75.
  • 8Eggener SE, Scardino PT, Walsh PC, Han M, Partin AW, et al. Predicting 15-year prostate cancer specific mortality after radical prostatectomy, d Urol 2011; 185: 869-75.
  • 9Swanson GP, Hussey MA, Tangen CM, Chin J, Messing E, etal. Predominant treatment failure in postprostatectomy patients is local: analysis of patterns of treatment failure in SWOG 8794. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 2225-9.
  • 10Mullins JK, Feng Z, Trock B J, Epstein JI, Walsh PC, et al. The impact of anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy on cancer control: the 30-year anniversary, J Urol 2012; 188: 2219-24.

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部