期刊文献+

澳大利亚公益诉讼制度的新发展与启示

原文传递
导出
摘要 澳大利亚公益诉讼制度起步较早,发展较为成熟。而当前,我国公益诉讼制度处于方兴未艾、寻求快速发展的阶段。本文试图从澳大利亚公益诉讼相关研究的最新入手,揭示澳大利亚的实践经验对我国公益诉讼实践的启发。
作者 林娜
出处 《法律适用》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第7期34-37,共4页 Journal of Law Application
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1彭跃进、郭全和.“域外环境行政公益诉讼扫描”,载《人民法院报》2016年3月4日第8版.
  • 2朱应平.澳大利亚行政公益诉讼原告资格探析[J].行政法学研究,2012(3):88-97. 被引量:14
  • 3Idit Kostiner,'Evaluating Legality:Toward a Cultural Approach to the Study of Law and Social Change(2003)37(2)Law&Society Review 323.
  • 4Michael Mc Cann(ed),Law and Social Movements(Ashgate,2006).
  • 5Reza Banakar,When do Rights Matter?'in Simon Halliday and Patrick Schmidt(eds),Human Rights Brought Home:Socio-Legal Studies on Human Rights in the National Context(Hart,2004).

二级参考文献71

  • 1Dr Chris McGrath .. "Flying foxes, dams and whales: Using federal environmental laws in the public interest "(2008) 25 EPLJ at 325-327 o.
  • 2" McKinnon v. Secretary, Department of Treasury " , (2005) 145 FCR 70 at [8]-[12].
  • 3Oshlack v. Richmond River Council " , (1998) 193 CLR 72; " Ruddock v. Vadarlis" , (No. 2) (2001) 115 FCR 2290.
  • 4" McKinnon v. Secretary, Department of Treasury " , (2006) 228 CLR 423 at [55]-[56].
  • 5" O' Sullivan v. Farrer " , (1989) CLR 210 at 216.
  • 6" Water Conservation & Irrigation Commission (NSW) v. Browning " , (1947) 74 CLR 492 at 505 per Dixon J.
  • 7(Australian Law Reform Commission) : " Costs Shifting-Who Pays for Litigation "Report No 75 (1995) at [13.2]o.
  • 8" Engadine Area Traffic Action Group Inc v. Sutherland SC (No.2) " , [2004] NSWLEC 434 at [15] per Lloyd J.
  • 9" Costs Shifting-Who Pays for Litigation " , Report No 75 (1995) at [13.2]-[13.14].
  • 10draft Standing (Federal and Territory Jurisdiction )Bill 1985 (Cth).

共引文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部