期刊文献+

西方非对称冲突语境下“中国军事威胁论”的文化逻辑——兼谈《孙子兵法》兵学传统何以被曲解

The Cultural Logic of “China Military Threat” under Western Asymmetric Conflict Context——Also on the Misinterpretation of Military Strategic Tradition of The Art of War
原文传递
导出
摘要 随着全球安全形势在21世纪的变化,西方话语对"非对称冲突"概念的政治意蕴和伦理内涵重新予以界定,以美国为首的西方国家将非对称作战手段视为最严重的威胁。在这一时代背景下,部分域外研究者将孙子学说定性为非对称冲突理论,以此证明中国战略文化传统中存在固有的威胁性基因,形成了支撑"中国军事威胁论"的特有文化逻辑。破解文化领域的"威胁"意象应从正确理解和阐释中国兵学传统出发,澄清西方战略理论视角下以偏概全的诡辩手法和认识误区,还原中国战略文化的和平本色。 As the global security situation has changed in the 21 stcentury, the political and ethical implication o'fasymmetric conflict'concept has been re-defined in the Western discourse.The US-led Western countries treat asymmetric means of warfare as the most serious threat. Against this background, some foreign researchers have taken Sun Tzu's doctrine asthe theory of asymmetric conflictin order to prove the inherent genetic threat existing in the Chinese strategic tradition of culture, thus forming the unique cultural logicof the'China military threat'. A correct understanding and interpretation of the traditional Chinese military strategy can work as a starting point from which we break the'threat'images in the cultural field and expose the sophistry and fallacies inthe Westernstrategic theory and return the Chinese strategic culture to its peacefulnature.
作者 张小龙
出处 《南京政治学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期54-59,141,共6页 Journal of PLA Nanjing Institute of Politics
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1许嘉.军事透明度与中美军事互信[J].和平与发展,2008(2):15-18. 被引量:4
  • 2Robert M. Cassidy. Why Great Powers Fight Small Wars Badly [J]. Military Review, Sep/Oct, 2002.
  • 3Stephen J. Blank.Rethinking Asymmetric Threa[R]. Carlisle: U.S Army War College, 2003.
  • 4Steven J. Lambakis, Reconsidering Asymmetric War- fare [J]. Joint Force Quarterly, Winter, 2005.
  • 5陈小明.当代非对称军事思维探析[J].南京政治学院学报,2006,22(6):83-85. 被引量:4
  • 6乔良,王湘穗.超限战[M].武汉:崇文书局,2010.
  • 7Michael N. Schmitt. Asymmetrical Warfare and Inter- national Humanitarian Law [J]. Air Force Law Review, Vol.62, 2008.
  • 8Sun Tzu. TheAtt of War [M]. New York: Oxford Uni- versity Press, 1963.
  • 9Mark Buries, Abram N. Shulsky. Patterns in China's Use of Force: Evidence l?om History and Doc~Thal Writings [R]. Washington: Rand, 2000.
  • 10[德]克劳塞维茨.战争论[M].中国人民解放军军事科学院,译.北京:解放军出版社,2004.

二级参考文献16

共引文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部