期刊文献+

临床决策辅助对产妇硬膜外分娩镇痛效果的影响 被引量:2

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:分析临床决策辅助对硬膜外分娩镇痛的影响。方法选取2015年8至12月在深圳市妇幼保健院分娩镇痛咨询门诊进行临床决策辅助辅导后最终采用硬膜外阻滞分娩镇痛的初产妇50名为临床决策组,选取同期在该院进行硬膜外阻滞分娩镇痛未进行临床决策辅助的初产妇50名为非临床决策组。记录其一般情况、剖宫产率、器械助产率、分娩前后STAI评分以及产后产妇满意度评分等。结果临床决策组剖宫产率是8%,非临床决策组剖宫产率是12%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。其中非临床决策组器械助产率4.5%,临床决策组无器械助产,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。两组产妇分娩前的STAI评分差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05),而分娩后的STAI评分差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。两组产妇分娩后满意度量化评分差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论临床决策辅助可以减轻产妇分娩前的焦虑状态,增强硬膜外分娩镇痛效果,提高产妇的满意度。
出处 《中国临床实用医学》 2016年第3期58-59,共2页 China Clinical Practical Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Edwards A,Elwyn G.The potential benefits of decision aids in clinical medicine[J].JAMA,1999,282(8):779-780.
  • 2华志民,陈强,陈真,王峥,季惠琴.临床决策辅助与根除幽门螺杆菌[J].中华消化杂志,2002,22(1):53-54. 被引量:9
  • 3Hodnett ED,Gates S,Hofmeyr GJ,et al.Continuous support for women during childbirth[J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2013,7:CD003766.
  • 4Simkin PP,O'hara M.Nonpharmacologic relief of pain during labor:systematic reviews of five methods[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002,186(Suppl 5):S 131 -S 159.
  • 5Smith CA,Collins CT,Cyna AM,et al.Complementary and alternative therapies for pain management in labour[J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2006,4:CD003521.
  • 6Carroll D,Tramer M,McQuay H,et al.Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in labour pain:a systematic review[J].Br J Obstet Gynaecol,1997,104(2):169-175.
  • 7Rosen MA.Nitrous oxide for relief of labor pain:a systematic review[J]. Am J Ohstet Gynecol,2002,186(Suppl 5):S110-S126.
  • 8NSW Department of Health:NSW Mothers and Babies 1998.In NSW Public Health Bulletin Volume 9.Sydney:NSW Department of Health; 2000.
  • 9Bricker L,Lavender T.Parenteral opioids for labor pain relief:a systematic review[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2002,186(5):S94-S109.
  • 10Leighton BL,Halpern SI-I.The effects of epidural analgesia on labor,maternal,and neonatal outcomes:a systematic review[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2002,186(SuppI 5):S69-S77.

二级参考文献5

  • 1Edwards A,Elwyn G.The potential benefits of decision aids in clinical medicine.JAMA,1999,282:779-780.
  • 2Coulter A.Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision making.J Health Serv Res Policy,1997,2:112-121.
  • 3Leman C,Biesecker B,Benkendorf JL,et al.Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA l gene testing.J Natl Cancer Inst,1997,89:148-157.
  • 4Quill TE,Brody H.Physician recommendations and patient autonomy: finding a balance between physician power and patient choice.Am Intern Med,1996,125:763-769.
  • 5Holmes-Rovner M,Kroll J,Rovner DR,et al.Patient decision support intervention: increased consistency with decision analytic models.Med Care,1999,37:270-284.

共引文献8

同被引文献25

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部