期刊文献+

现代逻辑视域下实质真理论研究

The Outline of a Substantive Theory of Truth
原文传递
导出
摘要 真是实质性质,说一个语句是真的意味着说出比这个语句本身更多的内容。实质真理论借鉴弗雷格的涵义确定指称原则以及塔斯基关于对象语言和元语言的区分,避免了多元真理论在统一性和多样性、局部性和全局性之间的纠结。实质真理论包括建构真理论和分层真理论。建构真理论由三个论题构成:根据社会历史因果描述论确定名称的指称;把语境原则与组合性原则结合起来确定语句的意义;实质真理建立在有经验内容的语义知识的基础上。分层真理论亦由三个论题构成:理论和模型之间的关系是理论和理论之间的关系;理论与理论之间的关系呈现出等级层次;理论与实在通过多种方式关联起来,实质真理表现为实用真理、迂回真理和实验真理。 Truth is a substantive property. To say that a sentence is true is to say more than justthe sentence itself. The substantive theory of truth not only draws on Frege's principle that sense de-termines referent and Tarski's distinction between object- language and meta- language, but alsoavoids conflicts between unity and diversity as well as between locality and globality in contemporarypluralist theories of truth. The substantive theory of truth includes constructive theory of truth and hi-erarchical theory of truth. The constructive theory of truth has three theses: the reference of name isdetermined in terms of social-historical causal descriptivism; the meaning of sentence is determinedin terms of compositionality combined with context principle; substantive truths are based on semanticknowledge with experiential contents. The hierarchical theory of truth also has three theses: the rela-tion between theory and model is that between theories; the series of theories has a hierarchical struc-ture; theories are related to reality in different ways, and substantive truths present as pragmatictruths, detour truths and experimental truths.
作者 刘靖贤 陈波
出处 《中国高校社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期61-77,158,共17页 Social Sciences in Chinese Higher Education Institutions
基金 国家社科基金重点项目“描述论和直接指称论之争--回顾、批判与建构”(12AZX008)和国家社科基金青年项目“弗雷格哲学著作编译研究”(15CZX035)阶段性成果
关键词 实质真理论 建构真理论 分层真理论 substantive theory of truth constructive theory of truth hierarchical theory of truth
  • 相关文献

参考文献36

  • 1陈波.语句的真、真的语句、真的理论体系——“truth”的三重含义辨析[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,44(1):27-34. 被引量:10
  • 2Warren Goldfarb, "Frege's Conception of Logic", in: Juliet Floyd and Sanford Shieh eds., Future Past: The Analytic Tradition in Twentieth-Century Philosophy, New York: Oxford University Press, 2001, pp. 25- 41.
  • 3Richard G. Heck,"Frege and Semantics", Grazer Pbilosophiscbe Studien,Vol. 75, 2007, pp. 27-63.
  • 4Jean Van Heijenoort, "Logic as Calculus and Logic as Language", Synthese, Vol. 17, 1967, pp. 324-330.
  • 5Jason Stanley, "Truth and Metatheory in Frege", Pacitic Philosophical Quaterly, Vol. 17, 1996, pp. 45-700.
  • 6Gottlob Frege, The Basic Laws of Arithmetic, M. Furth ed. and tr., Berkeley: University of California Press, 1964, p. 750.
  • 7Riehard G. Heek, "The Julius Caesar Objection", in: Richard Heck ed., Language, Thought, and Logic: Essays in Honour of Michael Dummett, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997, pp. 273- 308.
  • 8Gottlob Frege, "Thought", in: Gottlob Frege, Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy, Brian McGuiness ed., Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984, p. 354.
  • 9Gottlob Frege, "Logic (1897)", in: Gottlob Frege, Posthumous Writings, Hans Hermes, Friedrich Kambartel and Friedrich Kaulbach eds., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984, pp. 128- 129.
  • 10John Etchemendy, "Tarski on Truth and Logical Consequence", Journal of Symbolic Logic, Vol. 53, 1988, pp. 51-79.

二级参考文献52

  • 1维特根斯坦.逻辑哲学论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1996.103.
  • 2普特南.《“意义”的意义》,《逻辑与语言--分析哲学经典文选》,陈波,韩合林主编,东方出版社,2005年版,第466,473,474页.
  • 3卡尔·波普尔.《客观知识--一个进化论的研究》,舒炜光等译,上海:上海译文出版社,1987年,第114页.
  • 4唐纳德·戴维森.《对真理与解释的探究》,牟博等译,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007年,第202页.
  • 5康德 邓晓芒译.纯粹理性批判[M].北京:人民出版社,2004.170-171.
  • 6蒯因.从逻辑的观点看[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1987.4.
  • 7.列宁全集:第55卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1990..
  • 8苏珊·哈克.罗毅,张家龙译.逻辑哲学[M].北京:商务印书馆,2003.
  • 9Audi, Robert (ed.) The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy[ M] . Cambridge University Press, 1995.
  • 10Aristotle: Metaphysics, 1011b25.

共引文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部