期刊文献+

学术社交网络用户内容使用行为研究——基于科学网热门博文的实证分析 被引量:21

Content Using Behavior of Academic Social Network System:Case Study of Popular Blogs from Sciencenet.cn
原文传递
导出
摘要 【目的】用户内容使用行为对学术社交网络的可持续发展具有重要的价值,本文试图从用户阅读的角度对学术社交网络用户内容使用行为进行探究。【方法】以科学网热门博文为分析对象,采用方差分析、相关性分析等方法,从内容基本特征、用户内容使用行为关系、内容贡献者特征等方面对用户内容使用行为特征进行研究。【结果】用户对观点交流以及教学、科研经验分享类的内容比较感兴趣;大部分类别的博文评论量与被推荐量达到显著相关或高度相关的水平。【局限】研究平台单一,仅选择中文学术交流网站作为研究平台;对用户内容使用行为的研究不全面,仅研究了用户的内容阅读行为。【结论】用户喜欢在学术社交网络上进行思想与观点的表达与交流;他们更倾向于推荐自己参与互动的内容。 [Objective] This paper examines the content using behavior of an academic social network system. [Methods] First, we collected popular blog posts from Sciencenet.cn. Second, we classified these contents by their features. Finally, the user-content relationship and content contributors' characteristics were explored with the help of analysis of variance and co-relation tests. [Results] We found that users were more interested in the posts exchanging opinion, as well as those sharing teaching and research experience. Meanwhile, there was a significant correlation between the number of comments and recommendations most posts received. [Limitations] We studied one academic social network system in Chinese and only analyzed its users' reading behaviors. More research is needed to investigate other behaviors. [Conclusions] Many users exchange views on the academic social network system. These readers are more likely to recommend posts with their own comments to others.
出处 《现代图书情报技术》 CSSCI 2016年第6期63-72,共10页 New Technology of Library and Information Service
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"新研究领域科学文献传播网络生长及对传播效果影响研究"(项目编号:71373124) "江苏高校哲学社会科学重点研究基地"社会计算与舆情分析"(培育点)的阶段性研究成果之一
关键词 学术交流 用户生成内容 用户行为 学术社交网络 Scholarly communication User-generated contents Users behaviors Academic social networking
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献74

  • 1袁毅.链接分析用于学术网站评价存在的问题及解决办法[J].情报学报,2005,24(5):585-593. 被引量:20
  • 2何英,黄瑞华.论知识外部性引发的知识产权风险[J].科学学研究,2006,24(5):742-746. 被引量:23
  • 3edtechpost . http://www, edtechpost.ca/wordpress/ (2009- 03-28).
  • 4Yahoo! Site Explorer. http://siteexplorer, search, yaboo. com/(2009-03 28).
  • 5http://crookedtim-ber.org/2004/11/18/the-academic-contributions-of-blogging/(2009-04-10).
  • 6Nardi B A, Schiano D J, Gumbrecht M, et al. Why we blog[ J]. Communications of the ACM,2004, 47(12) :41 -46.
  • 7Dietrich S. Internet:New scientific research estab- lishments[ OL]. [ 2011 - 08 - 19 ]. http ://www. newso, org/ITNews/Trade/Intemet-new-scientific- research-establishments/29eafd05 - 7352 - 451a - 89bb - 3d7c98495f6c.
  • 8Jakob N. Participation inequality:Encouraging more users to contribute [ OL ]. [ 2011 - 08 - 20 ]. ht- tp ://www. useit, com/alertbox/participation _ ine- quality, htnd.
  • 9Hsu C L, Lin C C. Acceptance of blog usage:The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation [ J ]. Information and Management,2008,45 ( 1 ) :65 - 74.
  • 10Liao H L, Liu S H, Pi S M. Modeling motivations for b|ogging: An expectancy theory analysis [ J ]. Social Behavior and Personality, 2011,39 ( 2 ) :251 -264.

共引文献81

同被引文献278

引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部