期刊文献+

我国兴奋剂违规行为听证制度的历程评价与发展对策 被引量:4

Evaluation and Development Countermeasure of Anti-doping Rule Violation Hearing System in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在作出最终处理决定之前举行听证,给面临纪律处罚的运动员或体育团体一个表达意见的机会,是国际体育运动中的通行做法。这样做法不仅有利于查明事实真相,得出公正的处理决定,而且能最大限度地尊重和保护当事人、利害关系人的合法权益。自原国家体委于1995年发布《禁止在体育运动中使用兴奋剂的暂行规定》以来,我国的兴奋剂违规行为听证制度经历了确立、发展和全面接轨3个阶段,每个阶段均有各自的积极作用和存在的问题。如今,对这段历程进行回顾与总结,不仅能理清理论研究的思路,而且能发现当前听证工作的不足之处,为切实保障运动员基本权利以及我国今后的反兴奋剂工作提供帮助。2015年1月1日,国家体育总局令第20号《反兴奋剂管理办法》及其配套规范性文件《体育运动中兴奋剂管制通则》,与新版《世界反兴奋剂条例》同步实施,不仅完善了我国反兴奋剂法律体系,而且打通了国内机制与国际机制相衔接的通道。在今后的反兴奋剂斗争中,我国应在借鉴的基础上面向未来,让兴奋剂违规行为听证制度在兴奋剂管制过程中发挥更大的作用。从修订相关规范性文件和保障听证效果的实现这2方面提出发展对策,以期为完善我国的兴奋剂违规行为听证制度有所裨益。 Holding a hearing is the standard practices in international sports before making the ultimately decision which could give an opportunity to the athletes to express their opinion who are facing the disciplinary punishment. That method will not only help to find out the truth to get the fair decision but also can respect and protect the legitimate interest of the interested parties to the maximum extent. Since 1995 the ex-National Sports Administration published the relevant normative document,Anti-Doping Violations Hearing System in China have been through three stages of establishment,development and overall integration. Each stage has its positive aspects and problems. At present I reviewed and summarized this course to put our research ideas into shape and discover the shortcomings of the hearing system in order to safeguard the fundamental rights of athletes and help the anti-doping work in our nation. On 1 January,2015,General Administration of Sport of China Order No.20 Implementation Measures of anti-doping and its supporting regulatory documents General rules of doping control in Sports and the new version of World anti-doping Code are working in implementation simultaneously ,which not merely complete our nation’s anti-doping law system,but also build the connect channels between the national and international mechanism. During the fighting of doping, our nation should face the future on the basis of using the experience for reference and make the Anti-Doping Violations Hearing System play a more important role in doping control process. This article puts forward the development of measure in two aspects ,amendment of relevant regulatory documents and the guarantee of realization of hearing effects. We hope to have benefits for the improvement of our national Anti-Doping Violations Hearing System.
作者 夏婧
机构地区 江汉大学法学院
出处 《天津体育学院学报》 CAS CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期166-173,共8页 Journal of Tianjin University of Sport
基金 国家体育总局体育社会科学研究项目(项目编号:2377SS16114) 中国博士后科学基金项目(项目编号:2013M530853)
关键词 兴奋剂违规行为听证 听证程序 听证组织 听证效果 anti-doping rule violation hearing hearing process hearing panel hearing effects
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1薛波.元照英美法词典[M].北京.北京大学出版社,2013.1212.
  • 2BRYAN A. GARNER. Black' s Law Dictionary [M]. St. Paul:Thomson Reuters, 2004: 2109-2112.
  • 3国家体育总局.兴奋剂违规行为听证规则(暂行)[S].2011.
  • 4搜狐体育.二次听证“流产”,孙英杰寻求翻案时间紧迫[EB/OL].http://sports.sohu.com/20051208/n240913800.shtml.
  • 5东北新闻网.刘建生兴奋剂事件接续,终结足球生涯不能了事[EB/OL].http://www.nen.com.cn/72626041549488128/20041210/1565739.shtml.
  • 6大众网.田协已通知孙英杰,是否听证看当事人意愿[EB/OL].http://yantai.dzwww.com/xinwen/tiyu/sports/t20051108_1251590.htm.
  • 7新浪网.刘建生兴奋剂事件追踪[EB/OL].http://sports.sina.com.cn/s/2004-12-03/2307433538s.shtml.
  • 8王名扬.美国行政法[M].北京:法治出版社,1987:437.
  • 9JAN WILLEM SOEK. The Fundamental Rights of Athletes in Doping Trails[M]//JOHN O' LEARY (ed.).Drugs and Doping in Sport: Socio-le- gal Perspectives. Sydney: Cavendish Publishing Limited, 2001 : 57-74.
  • 10WADA. World Anti-doping Code [S]. 2003.

二级参考文献6

  • 1齐树洁,王晖晖.当事人陈述制度若干问题新探[J].河南省政法管理干部学院学报,2002,17(2):61-66. 被引量:11
  • 2何家弘主编.新编证据法学.法律出版社.2006.
  • 3江伟主编.民事诉讼法学.高等教育出版社.2000年版.第368页.
  • 4[德]罗森贝克,施瓦布,戈特瓦尔德著.李大雪译.德国民事诉讼法(上).中国法制出版社.2007年版.第451页.
  • 5[日]高桥宏志著.林剑锋译.民事诉讼法——制度与理论的深层分析.法律出版社.2003年版.第378页.
  • 6[美]哈伯特L.帕克著.梁根林等译.刑事制裁的界限.法律出版社.2008年版.第251页.

共引文献4

同被引文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部