摘要
美国司法界在处理"法庭上的高校"争议的历史中,发展出了"学术尊重"原则,据此对高校的学术自由提供保障。而在实际的司法审查中,"学术尊重"原则却不断遭受质疑,司法机关常常陷入两难困境:如何平衡学术自由权利在高校作为高等教育组织机构和教师个体之间的关系。本文从话语分析的角度对近年来引起美国社会关注的一例学术纠纷案进行深入的文本分析,从而帮助辨识法院在处理上述关系时的态度立场和价值取向,准确把握学术尊重、学术自由和大学自治三者的关系和意涵。
American courts established the doctrine of academic deference in dealing with disputes related to universities to guarantee the academic autonomy of universities.However,in practical judicial reviews,this doctrine has been questioned constantly and left judicial authority to fall into a dilemma：How academic freedom as a connection relating educational institutions and individual teachers could be balanced at universities.This paper,based on the approach of discourse analysis,elaborates a recent case of an academic dispute which drew with drawing the American society＇s attention.Readers will be benefitted to distinguish the attitude and value of the courts when handling above issues and to understand the substantive meaning of academic deference,university autonomy and academic freedom in a more precise way.
出处
《清华大学教育研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第3期109-117,共9页
Tsinghua Journal of Education
基金
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"高等学校分类管理的比较研究"(13JJD880002)
关键词
学术尊重
学术自由
大学自治
话语分析
academic deference
academic freedom
university autonomy
discourse analysis
