期刊文献+

晚期乳腺癌治疗后单纯血清肿瘤标志物升高二线治疗的价值 被引量:9

The intervention studies of merely elevated serum tumor markers in advanced breast cancer posttreatment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨晚期乳腺癌患者经一线姑息化疗有效后,随诊仅出现肿瘤标志物升高时早期给予二线治疗的临床价值。方法:选取在我院就诊影像学检查有转移病灶,同时伴有肿瘤标志物癌胚抗原(CEA)和(或)糖类抗原15-3(CA-153)升高,经一线姑息化疗有效后,随诊过程中单纯出现肿瘤标志物再次升高的晚期乳腺癌患者42例。根据是否给予二线治疗分为治疗组(20例)和观察组(22例)。主要观察自单纯出现肿瘤标志物升高至影像学出现疾病进展时间(PFSmarker)。结果:晚期乳腺癌一线治疗后,血CEA 及CA-153仍呈下降趋势,随诊过程中单纯出现CEA和(或)CA-153升高时给予二线治疗可以使其再次下降,而观察组则持续升高直至影像学出现肿瘤进展。治疗组PFSmarker为13.65(6~24)个月,观察组为8.18(3~15)个月,两组差异有统计学意义(P <0.05),治疗组明显长于观察组。结论:晚期乳腺癌患者一线治疗有效后,随诊中仅出现肿瘤标志物再次升高,早期给予二线治疗可延缓疾病进展,改善生存。 Objective To evaluate the clinical value of early intervention of second-line treatment for advanced breast cancer patients who experienced elevated tumor marker without any evidence for progress on imaging after effective first-line treatment. Methods We recruited 42 metastatic breast cancer patients experiencing elevated tumor marker (CEA or CA-153) meanwhile, who had merely increased tumor markers again in regular review after effective first-line treatment. Patients were divided into two groups: 20 patients in treatment group were given second-line treatment (palliative chemotherapy); 22 patients in observation group insisted on regular follow-up without any changing of treatment strategy. We mainly evaluated PFSmarker , which was defined as the time between tumor markers increase and disease progression. Results CEA and CA-153 in patients with advanced breast cancer showed a tendency to decrease after first-line chemotherapy , which can be reduced again by second-line treatment while increased in regular review , and the observation group continued to rise until disease progressed. The PFSmarker in treatment group was 13.65 (6 ~ 24) months while that of the observation group was 8.18 (3 ~ 15) months. The difference of PFS between these two groups was statistically significant (P 〈 0.05) and the median time to disease progression in treatment group was significantly longer than that in observation group. Conclusions Early intervention of second-line treatment for advanced breast cancer patients who only experienced elevated tumor marker after effective first-line treatment could slow down disease progression and improve the quality of life.
出处 《实用医学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2016年第12期1975-1979,共5页 The Journal of Practical Medicine
关键词 糖类抗原15-3(CA-153) 癌胚抗原(CEA) 乳腺肿瘤 肿瘤标志物 CA-153 CEA Breast cancer Tumor marker
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1TORRE LA, BRAY F, SIEGEL RL, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012 [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2015,65 (2) : 87-108.
  • 2TAO Z, SHI A, LU C, et al. Breast Cancer: Epidemiology and Etiology [ Z ]. Cell Biochem Biophys 2015,72 : 333 -338.
  • 3FAN L, STRASSER-WEIPPL K, LI JJ, et al. Breast cancer in China [ J ]. Lancet Oncol, 2014,15 (7) : e279-e289.
  • 4PEDERSEN AC, SORENSEN PD, JACOBSEN EH, et al. Sensitivity of CA 15-3, CEA and serum HER2 in the earlydetection of recurrence of breast cancer [ J ]. Clin Chem Lab Med ,2013,51 (7) : 1511-1519.
  • 5CARDOSO F, HARBECK N, FALLOWFIELD L, et al. Locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up [Z]. 2012, 23 Suppl 7,i11-i19.
  • 6秦柳霄,梁嵘,陈昕妤,廖小莉,廖思娜,原春玲,黎倩,李永强,韦明景,蓝肖玲,朱丽君,刘志辉.3种肿瘤标志物在不可测量病灶的晚期乳腺癌患者血清中的水平变化及其临床意义[J].中国癌症防治杂志,2014,6(1):39-42. 被引量:4
  • 7陶四青,董浙清.观察肿瘤标志物对预测乳腺癌复发转移的临床应用价值[J].中国临床药理学杂志,2011,27(6):414-416. 被引量:10
  • 8CARDOSO F, COSTA A, NORTON L, et al. ESO-ESMO 2nd international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC2) [ J ]. Breast, 2014,23 (5) : 489-502.
  • 9EISENHAUER EA, THERASSE P, BOGAERTS J, et al. Newresponse evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) [J]. Eur J Cancer,2009,45 (2) :228- 247.
  • 10NICOLINI A, CARPI A, MICHELASSI C, et al. "Tumour marker guided" salvage treatment prolongs survival of breast cancer patients: final report of a 7-year study [J ]. Biomed Pharmacother, 2003,57 (10) : 452-459.

二级参考文献27

  • 1何小江,俞浩,吴华,黄劲雄,俞丹,苏新辉.血清肿瘤标志物预测乳腺癌骨转移的价值[J].肿瘤防治研究,2006,33(8):583-584. 被引量:10
  • 2高寒,姜军,杨新华,范林军,谢竞,周艳.5种血清标志物的不同组合对提高乳腺癌诊断的意义[J].第三军医大学学报,2007,29(12):1255-1257. 被引量:27
  • 3Nishimura R,Nagao K,Miyayama H.et al.Elevated serum CA153 levels correlate with positive estrogen receptor and imitial favorable outcome in patients who died from recurrent breast cancer[J].Breast Cancer,2003;10:220-227.
  • 4Osman N,O'Leary N,Mulcahy E,et al.Correlation of serum CA125 with stage,grade and survival of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer at a single centre[J].Irish Med.J,2008;101:245-257.
  • 5Tewes M, Aktas B, Welt A, et al. Molecular profiling and predictive value of circulating tumor cells in patients with metastatic breast cancer: an option for monitoring response to breast cancer related therapies [J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2009,115(3) :581-590.
  • 6Fersching D M, Nagel D, Siegele B, et al. Apoptosis-related biomarkers sFAS, MIF, ICAM-1 and PAI-1 in serum of breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy [J]. Anticancer Res, 2012,32 (5) : 2047-2058.
  • 7Kucera R, Cema M, Narsanska A, et al. Growth factors and breast tumors, comparison of selected growth factors with traditional tumor markers [ J ]. Anticancer Res, 2011,31 ( 12 ) : 4653-4656.
  • 8Lee G, Ge B, Huang T K, et al. Positive identification of CA215 pan cancer biomarker from serum specimens of cancer patients [J]. Cancer Biomark, 2010,6(2) : 111-117.
  • 9Zhu W, Michael C W. WT1, monoclonal CEA, TYF1 and CA125 antibodies in the differential diagnosis of lung, breast, and ovarian adenocarcinomas in serous effusions [J ]. Diagn Cytopathol, 2007,35(6) :370-375.
  • 10Cheung KL, Graves CR, RobertsonJF.Tumour marker measurements in the diagnosis and monitoring of breast cancerj]].Cancer Treat Rev ,2000,26(2) :91-102.

共引文献35

同被引文献77

引证文献9

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部