期刊文献+

利福喷丁与利福平治疗肺结核的疗效与不良反应比较 被引量:3

Comparison the Treatment and Untoward Effect of the Phthisis by Rifapentini and Rifampicin
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较利福喷丁与利福平治疗肺结核的疗效与不良反应。方法选择我院2014年7月-2015年7月收治的86例肺结核患者作为研究对象,并随机分为两组,每组43例,对照组采用利福平治疗,实验组给予利福喷丁。详细记录治疗过程中两组患者出现不良反应情况与治疗后临床有效率,并展开对比分析。结果实验组临床治疗总有效率为93.1%,高于对照组的76.7%,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);实验组与对照组不良反应率分别为13.9%、30.2%,两组差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论利福喷丁较利福平治疗肺结核具有明显临床疗效,且有效降低不良反应率,促进患者恢复健康。 Objective To compared treatment effect and untoward effect of the phthisis by rifapentini and rifampicin. Methods Selected 86 cases of patients with phthisis at our hospital from July 2014 to July 2015 as the object, to randomly divided into two groups, each 43 cases. The control group was treated by rifampicin, the treatment group was treated by rifampicin. To detailed record the untoward effect during the treatment and clinical effective rate of posttreatment, and to comparative analysed them. Results The total effective treatment rate of the treatment group was 93.1%, was higher than the 76.7% of the control, there was statistical significance(P〈0.05). The untoward effect of the treatment group and control group was 13.9% and 30.2%, there was statistical significance(P〈0.05). Conclusion That has obvious clinical effects of the phthisis by rifapentini that compared with the rifampicin, and effectively reduce the untoward effect, to improve the pull through of patients.
作者 任淑君
出处 《中国继续医学教育》 2016年第16期168-169,共2页 China Continuing Medical Education
关键词 利福喷丁 利福平 肺结核 疗效 不良反应 Rifapentini Rifampicin Phthisis Treatment effect Untoward effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献41

  • 1王雪松.老年肺结核病临床特点分析[J].泰山医学院学报,2004,25(3):224-225. 被引量:4
  • 2中华人民共和国卫生部.肺结核诊断标准WS288-2008[S].2008.
  • 3肖东楼,王文杰,许绍发,等.中国结核病防治规划痰涂片镜检标准化操作及质量保证手册[M].北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2008.
  • 4潘纪戌,张国桢,蔡祖龙.胸部CT鉴别诊断学[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,2004:104.
  • 5de Castilla D L,Rakita R M,Spitters C E.Short-course isoniazid plus rifapentine directly observed therapy for latenttuberculosis in solid-organ transplant candidates[J].Transplantation,2014,97(2):206-211.
  • 6Dorman S E,Goldberg S,Stout J E.Substitution of rifapentine for rifampin during intensive phase treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis:study 29 of the tuberculosis trials consortium[J].J Infect Dis,2012,206(7):1030-1040.
  • 7Sharma S K,Sharma A,Kadhiravan T.Rifamycins (rifampicin,rifabutin and rifapentine) compared to isoniazid for preventing tuberculosis in HIV-negative people at risk of active TB[J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2013,7:CD007545.
  • 8陈月华.利福喷丁与利福平在肺结核治疗中的药效比较及安全性评价.中国保健营养(中旬刊),2014(7):4550-4551.
  • 9曹晓枫.利福喷丁与利福平对尘肺合并肺结核患者肝功能影响的比较研究.健康必读(中旬刊),2012,11(12):307.
  • 10朱小华.利福喷丁与利福平治疗老年涂阳肺结核疗效比较分析.医学信息,2012,25(10):62-63.

共引文献68

同被引文献33

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部