摘要
社会资本对抗争行动的影响是一项重要的研究议题。现有研究大多强调了社会资本在抗争动员方面所发挥的作用,对中国城市业主抗争的实证研究也倾向于认为社会资本对抗争参与具有积极的影响效应。文章指出,对社会资本和业主抗争的性质进行辨识是分析的基础,社区社会资本是一个多维度的概念,而业主抗争也呈现多重属性,两者的关系不能一概而论。基于2006 2010年对上海的抽样调查数据,文章运用多层线性模型考察了社区社会资本对业主抗争的不同策略类型(内部协商型、引援型和政治化型)的影响。统计结果表明,社区社会资本并不总是促进业主参与抗争。对政治化型抗争,社区社会资本不产生作用;而对另外两类抗争,社区社会资本具有正向的影响。
The impact of social capital on contentious actions is an important issue. Current studies mostly lay stress on the role of social capital in contentious mobilization. Empirical studies on homeowners' resistance in urban China suggest that social capital facilitates contentious participation. This paper points out that identifying the nature of both social capital and homeowners' resistance is the basis of analysis. As community social capital is a multi-dimensional conception and homeowners' resistance exhibits multiple properties, their relationship cannot be regarded as the same. Based on the multilevel linear regression analysis of the sample survey data collected in Shanghai from 2006 to 2010, this paper explores the influence of community social capital on different types of homeowners' resistance strategies (internally negotiatory resistance, resource aiding resistance and politicized resistance). Statistical results reveal that community social capital does not always promote homeowners' participation in resistance. Community social capital has no effect on politicized resistance while having positive effects on the other two types of resistance.
出处
《同济大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第3期50-59,共10页
Journal of Tongji University:Social Science Edition
基金
上海市教育委员会科研创新重点项目(项目编号:13ZS005)
教育部人文社会科学研究项目(项目编号:14YJA840005)
关键词
社会资本
社区
业主
抗争
social capital
community
homeowners
resistance