期刊文献+

数字技术在个性化全膝关节置换下肢轴向力线控制中的应用 被引量:2

Application of digital technology in control of lower extremity axial alignment in personalized total knee arthroplasty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较数字化技术和传统定位方法在进行全膝关节置换术(TKA)时对恢复下肢机械轴线的准确性。方法选取2013年2月至2015年4月膝骨性关节炎患者95例(100膝)进行前瞻性研究。随机分为传统手术组和数字化技术组,每组50膝。传统手术组中48例(50膝),男21例(22膝),女27例(28膝),平均年龄年龄(68.4±7.2)岁,采用传统的标准TKA;数字化技术组中47例(50膝),男20例(23膝),女27例(27膝),平均年龄年龄(69.3±8.2)岁,术前CT扫描和M imics软件建立患肢股骨和胫骨的三维模型,模拟术中截骨定位杆的使用,确定定位杆在股骨髁的进针点及"术中股骨外翻角";在关节置换术中精确复制该过程进行股骨远端和胫骨平台的截骨;两组患者采用同一品牌关节假体,所有病例均为同一医师完成手术。两组病例术后均拍摄下肢全长正位X片,测量并比较股骨轴向力线与假体下缘连线的夹角(A角),胫骨轴向力线与假体上缘连线的夹角(B角),股骨轴向力线和胫骨轴向力线的夹角(C角)来验证下肢轴向力线的准确性。结果数字化技术组47例患者(50膝)"术中股骨外翻角"平均为5.83±1.85°(3.25°~9.36°),术中均能很顺利地找到股骨和胫骨髓内定位杆进针点并进行手术,术后摄片测量平均A角为90.34°±1.61°(87.10°~92.88°),B角为89.97°±1.37°(88.12°~92.33°),C角为1.56°±0.72°(0.11°~2.59°)。传统手术组48例患者(50膝)平均A角为91.18°±2.20°(86.57°~94.59°),B角为88.89°±3.25°(82.19°~92.30°),C角为3.21°±1.56°(0.25°~6.32°),差异有统计学意义。结论参照数字化技术模拟术中定位过程进行术前计划进行截骨可以更好地控制术后下肢轴向力线,有利于更加精确地进行个性化手术。 Objective To compare the accuracy of digital technology assisted total knee arthroplasty(TKA) with conventional positioning TKA for restoration of lower-extremity mechanical axis.Methods Ninety five patients(100 knees) undergoing TKA from February 2013 and April 2015 were randomly divided into the conventional surgery(CS) group(48 cases with 50 knees) and the digitaltechnology surgery(DS) group(47 cases with 50 knees).For the DS group,the CT scan images of the lower extremity were obtained and mimics was used to reconstruct the three-dimensional model;according to the definition of axial alignment of the lower extremity,the entry points of femur and tibia were determined and the intraoperative femoral valgus angle was measured by simulating the intramedullary positioning rod;and the osteotomy at the distal femur and the proximal tibia was performed during the surgery.Patients of both groups used the same brand of joint prostheses and all operations were performed by the same surgeon.The angles A,B and C were measured from the X-ray images which were examined after the surgery to verify the accuracy of axial alignment of the lower extremity.Results The average of intraoperative femoral valgus angle of DS group was(5.83 ±1.85°)(3.25°-9.36°) and it was easy to be found the entry points in the surgery.The angles A,B and C were 90.34° ± 1.61°(87.10°-92.88°),89.97° ± 1.37°(88.12°-92.33°),and 1.56° ±0.72°(0.11°-2.59°) in CS group;the angles A,B and C were 91.18° ± 2.20°(86.57°-94.59°),8.89° ± 3.25°(82.19°-92.30°) and 3.21° ± 1.56°(0.25°-6.32°),respectively;the difference of two groups was statistically significant(P〈0.05).Conclusion The study shows that simulating the intraoperative localization process in preoperative planning via digital technology can lead to better precision of axial alignment of the lower extremity.
出处 《同济大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 2016年第3期91-96,共6页 Journal of Tongji University(Medical Science)
基金 上海市卫生局基金(20124463)
关键词 关节成形术 置换 外科手术 计算机辅助 arthroplasty replacement knee surgery computer-assisted
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1杨子波,廖威明,傅明.初次全膝关节置换系列讲座(二) 初次膝关节置换术中股骨与胫骨侧截骨的基本技术[J].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2012,6(2):66-66. 被引量:2
  • 2Zhang GQ, Chen JY, Chai W, et al. Comparison between computer-assisted-navigation and conventional total knee arthroplasties in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral procedures a randomized clinical trial[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2011,93(13): 1190 -1196.
  • 3Blakeney WG, Khan R J, Palmer JL. Functional outcomes following total knee arthroplasty: a randomised trial comparing computer-assisted surgery with conventional techniques[ J]. Knee,2014,21 (2) : 364 - 368.
  • 4Gothesen O, Espehaug B, Havelin LI, et al. Functional outcome and alignment in computer-assisted and conventionally operated total knee replacements: a multicentre parallel-group randomised controlled trial [J]. Bone Joint J,2014,96-B(5) : 609 -618.
  • 5魏艳辉,马敏,尹峰.TKA术中假体旋转力线控制的研究进展[J].同济大学学报(医学版),2015,36(6):137-140. 被引量:1
  • 6Lutzner J, Dexel J, Kirschner S. No difference between computerassisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty : five-year results of a prospective randomised study [ J ]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc ,2013,21 (10) : 2241 - 2247.
  • 7徐军,姜雪峰,孙惠清,杨惠光,沈建国.计算机辅助下全膝关节置换术对恢复下肢机械轴线的准确性研究[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2014,34(12):1800-1804. 被引量:2
  • 8Chotanaphuti T, Wangwittayakul V, Khuangsirikul S, et al. The accuracy of component alignment in custom cutting blocks compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty instrumentation: prospective control trial [J]. Knee, 2014, 21 (1): 185-188.
  • 9Tibesku CO, Hofer P, Portegies W, et al. Benefits of using customized instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: results from an activity-based costing model[ J ]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2013,133 (3): 405 -411.
  • 10张庆猛,陈继营.个性化截骨工具辅助全膝关节置换术最新研究进展[J].中国骨与关节外科,2014,7(5):442-446. 被引量:4

二级参考文献133

共引文献38

同被引文献4

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部