工作重塑对工作投入的影响:基于优势比较分析方法

The Effect of Job Crafting on Job Engagement: Based on the Method of Relative Importance Analysis

文章旨在探讨三维工作重塑量表与四维工作重塑量表、同一量表不同维度对工作投入相对解释力。采用问卷调查,以327名员工为被试,运用回归分析、优势比较分析对假设进行检验。结果表明:(1)任务重塑、认知重塑与工作投入显著正相关,关系重塑与工作投入不相关,且任务重塑、认知重塑与关系重塑对工作投入的解释力依次递减;(2)增加结构性工作资源、增加挑战性工作要求正向预测工作投入,而减少阻碍性工作要求、增加社会性工作资源对工作投入的影响不显著,且增加结构性工作资源、增加挑战性工作要求、减少阻碍性工作要求、增加社会性工作资源对工作投入的解释力依次递减;(3)四维工作重塑量表对工作投入的解释力高于三维工作重塑量表,但差异不大。

The present investigation explores the different effects of different measurements and dimensions of job crafting on job engagement. Using survey method,we collect data from 327 employees and examine our hypotheses. The results indicate that：（ 1） cognitive crafting and task crafting significantly influence job engagement,whereas relationship crafting does not. The relative importance of tasking crafting,cognitive crafting and relationship crafting on job engagement declines in turn;（ 2） increasing structure job resources and increasing challenging job demands have positive effect on job engagement,whereas increasing social job resources and decreasing hindering job demands do not. The effect sizes of increasing structure job resources,increasing challenging job demands,increasing social job resources and decreasing hindering job demands gradually diminish;（ 3） as predicted,Tims＇ four-dimension job crafting scale explains more for job engagement than Slemp＇s three-dimension job crafting questionnaire. What calls for special attention is that the difference is very small.