期刊文献+

全身麻醉方式对全子宫切除术患者术后认知功能的影响 被引量:24

Effect of general anesthetic mode on postoperative cognitive dysfunction in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨两种全身麻醉方式对腹腔镜下根治性广泛全子宫切除术患者术后认知功能的影响。方法将100例择期腹腔镜下根治性广泛全子宫切除术患者分为两组:丙泊酚组(P组)、七氟醚组(S组),每组各50例。记录麻醉时间、舒芬太尼用量、维库溴铵用量、苏醒时间、定向力恢复时间,记录麻醉复苏期并发症。分别于术前1d(T_0)、术后1d(T_1)、术后3d(T_2)、术后7d(T_3)、术后1个月(T_4)、术后3个月(T_5)对患者进行简易智能状态量表(MMSE)评分,采用Z计分法评定术后认知功能障碍(POCD)发生情况。结果与P组比较,S组舒芬太尼用量及维库溴铵用量较少(P<0.05),苏醒时间及定向力恢复时间增加(P<0.05),S组患者出现寒战、躁动、上呼吸道梗阻较多(P<0.05)。组间MMSE评分变化相比较,差异无统计学意义(F=0.14,P=0.709);时间点MMSE评分变化相比较,差异有统计学意义(F=74.46,P<0.01);全身麻醉方式与时间MMSE评分之间存在交互效应(F=7.99,P<0.01);与P组比较,T_1、T_2时间点S组MMSE评分较低(P<0.05),S组中T_1、T_2、T_3、T_4时间点POCD发生率高(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜下根治性广泛全子宫切除术中,采用七氟醚吸入麻醉患者较丙泊酚麻醉患者POCD发生率较高,但3个月后POCD发生率无差异。 Objective To investigate the influence of two general gnesthestic modes on postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) in the patients undergoing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy. Methods One hundred ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ patients undergoing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy were randomly allocated to the propofol group (group P) and sevoflurane group (group S).50 cases in each group. The anaesthesia time, total dose of sufentanil, total dose of vecuronium,recovery time, recovery time for regaining orientation and complications during anesthetic recovery period were recorded. The cognitive function was assessed by the mini-mental state examination (MMSE) on preoperative 1 d (T0), postoperative 1 d (T1), postoperative 3 d, (T2), postoperative 7 d (T3 ), postoperative 1 month (T4),postoperative 3 months (T5) and the POCD occurrence situation was evaluated by adopting the Z scoring, Results The total dose of sufentanil and vecuronium in the group S was lower than that in the group P (P〈0. 05) ,the recovery time and time for regaining orientation m the group S was longer than that in the group P (P〈0.05) ;the incidence rates of shive- ring, dysphoria and upper respiratory tract obstruction in the group S were higher than those in the group P (P〈0. 05). There were no statistically significant difference in the MMSE scores between the two groups (F=0. 14 ,P=0.709); the MMSE scores in each group had statistical differences among different time points (F=74.46,P〈0.01). The interaction effect existed between the general anesthetic mode and time with MMSE score (F= 7.99 ,P〈0.01) ;the MMSE scores at T1 ,T2 in the group S were lower than those in the group P (P〈0.05). The incidence rate of POCD at T1 ,T2,T3 ,T4 in the group S was higher than that in the group P (P〈0.05). Conclusion The incidence rate of POCD in the patients undergoing taparoscopic radical hysterectomy by adopting sevoflurane inhalation general anaesthesia is higher than that by adopting propofol anesthesia, but which has no difference after postoperative 3 months.
出处 《重庆医学》 CAS 北大核心 2016年第20期2769-2771,2774,共4页 Chongqing medicine
基金 广东省佛山市医学类科技攻关项目(2014AB000602)
关键词 子宫切除术 腹腔镜检查 术后认知功能障碍 丙泊酚 七氟醚 hysterectomy laparoscopy postoperative cognitive dysfunction propofol sevoflurane
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1许德奖,杨威,赵国栋.丙泊酚与气体麻醉对老年患者术后认知功能障碍的影响:Meta分析[J].南方医科大学学报,2012,32(11):1623-1627. 被引量:93
  • 2Steinmetz J, Funder KS, Dahl BT, et al. Depth of anaes- thesia and post-operative cognitive dysfunction[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2010,54(2):162-168.
  • 3Duvaldestin P, Kuizenga K, Saldien V, et al. A random- ized, dose-response study of sugammadex given for the re- versal of deep rocuronium or vecuronium-induced neuro- muscular blockade under sevoflurane anesthesia [J]. Anesth Analg,2010,110(1) : 74-82.
  • 4Liang C,Ding M,Du F,et al. Sevoflurane/propofol coad- ministration provides better recovery than sevoflurane in combined general/epidural anesthesia., a randomized clini- cal trial[J]. J Anesth,2014,28(5) :721-726.
  • 5Singh SK,KumarA,Mahan R,et al. Comparison of re- covery profile for propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia in cases of open cholecystectomy[J].Anesthesia, essays and researches,2015,7(3):386-389.
  • 6Haseneder R, Kochs E,Jungwirth B. Postoperative cogni- tive dysfunction. Possible neuronal mechanisms and prac- tical consequences for clinical routine[J]. Anaesthesist, 2012,61(5) :437-443.
  • 7Schoen J, Husemann L, Tiemeyer C, et al. Cognitive func- tion after sevoflurane- vs propofol-based anaesthesia for on-pump cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Br J Anaesth,2011,106(6) :840-850.
  • 8Tang N, Ou C, Liu Y, et al. Effect of inhalational anaes- thetic on postoperative cognitive dysfunction following radical rectal resection in elderly patients with mild cogni- tive impairment[J]. J Int Med Res, 2014, 42 (6) : 1252- 1261.
  • 9Chan MT,Cheng BC, Lee TM, et al. BIS-guided anesthe- sia decreases postoperative delirium and cognitive decline [J]. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol, 2013,25 (1): 33-42.
  • 10Shoair OA,Grasso Ii MP, Lahaye LA, et al. Incidence and risk factors for postoperative cognitive dysfunction in ol- der adults undergoing major noncardiac surgery: A pro- spective study[J]. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol, 2015, 31(1) : 30-36.

二级参考文献19

  • 1Moller JT, Cluitmans P, Rasmussen LS, et al. Long-term postoperative cognitive dysfunction in the elderly: ISPOCD1 study [J]. Lancet, 1998, 351(9106): 857-61.
  • 2Mason SE, Noel-Storr A, Ritchie CW. The impact of general and regional anesthesia on the incidence of post-operative cognitive dysfunction and post-operative delirium: a systematic review with Meta-analysis[J]. J Alzheimers Dis, 2010, 22 SuPPI 3: 67-79.
  • 3Hocker J, StaPelfeldt C, Leiendecker J, et al. PostoPerative neuroeognitive dysfimction in elderly patients after xenon versus propofol anesthesia for major noncardiac surgery: a double-blinded randomized controlled Pilot study[J]. Anesthesiology, 2009, 110(5): 1068-76.
  • 4Rohan D, Buggy DJ, Crowley S, et al. Increased incidence of postoperative cognitive dysftmction 24 hr after minor surgery in the elderly[J]. Can J Anaesth, 2005, 52(2): 137-42.
  • 5Rasmussen LS, J. Jakobsson, comparison of xenon with propofol for supplementary general anaesthesia for knee replacement: a randomized study[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2006, 97(2): 154-9.
  • 6Kozinn J, Mao L, Arora A, et al. Inhibition of glutamatergic activation of extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases in hippocampal neurons by the intravenous anesthetic propofol [J]. Anesthesiology, 2006, 105(6): 1182-91.
  • 7Kingston S, Mao L, Yang L, et al. Propofol inhibits phosphorylation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor NR1 subunits in neurons[J]. Anesthesiology, 2006, 104(4): 763-9.
  • 8Fibuch EE, Wang JQ. Inhibition of the MAPK/ERK cascade: a potential transcription-dependent mechanism for the amnesic effect of anesthetic propofol[J]. Neurosci Bull, 2007, 23(2): 119-24.
  • 9Xie Z, Dong Y, Maeda U, et al. The inhalation anesthetic isoflurane induces a vicious cycle of apoptosis and amyloid beta-protein accumulation[J]. J Neurosci, 2007, 27(6): 1247-54.
  • 10Scholtzova H, Wadghiri YZ, Douadi M, et al. Memantine leads to behavioral improvement and amyloid reduction in Alzheimer's- disease-model transgenic mice shown as by micromagnetic resonance imaging[J]. Neurosci Res, 2008, 86(12): 2784-91.

共引文献92

同被引文献172

引证文献24

二级引证文献98

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部