期刊文献+

子宫下段受累可能为Ⅰ期内膜癌辅助放疗的不良预后因素 被引量:1

Lower Uterine Segment Involvement as a Predictor for Poor Prognosis in Patients Receiving Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Stage Ⅰ Endometrial Carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨子宫下段受累对Ⅰ期子宫内膜癌术后放疗患者的预后作用。方法回顾性分析1999年1月至2012年12月在北京协和医院进行术后放疗的Ⅰ期子宫内膜癌患者265例,中位年龄53岁,病理类型主要为子宫内膜样腺癌(226例,85.3%)。根据病理结果是否有子宫下段受累分为两组:子宫下段受累组和子宫下段未受累组,比较两组患者的预后因素和临床治疗结果,并对其中的高危和高中危患者进行亚组分析。主要研究终点包括总生存率、无进展生存率、局部区域复发率、远处转移率和治疗失败率。使用Kaplan-Meier法统计生存率,不同组间生存率的比较使用Log-rank检验,使用Cox比例风险回归模型进行预后因素分析。结果所有Ⅰ期内膜癌患者的5年总生存率和无进展生存率分别为92.8%和89.7%,5年局部区域复发率、远处转移率和治疗失败率分别为4.5%、6.4%和7.8%。单因素分析显示,子宫下段受累是影响总生存率和无进展生存率的相关因素(P=0.015,0.035)。Cox比例风险回归模型显示,子宫下段受累组患者的总生存率和无进展生存率更低(P=0.041,RR=0.346,95%CI:0.125~0.959;P=0.041,RR=0.411,95%CI:0.175~0.963)。亚组单因素分析显示,在高危和高中危患者中,子宫下段受累是影响治疗失败率的相关因素(P=0.034)。结论子宫下段受累可能是影响Ⅰ期内膜癌辅助放疗患者总生存率和无进展生存率的不良预后因素;在高危和高中危患者中,子宫下段受累主要与治疗失败的发生相关。 Objective To explore the effect of lower uterine segment involvement (LUSI) in predicting the prognosis of stageⅠendometrial carcinoma patients treated with postoperative radiotherapy .Methods The data of a total of 265 patients with stage Ⅰendometrial carcinoma treated with hysterectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy be -tween January 1999 and December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed .The median age of the cohort was 53 years.The most common pathological type was endometrioid adenocarcinoma (226/265, 85.3%).The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of LUSI:LUSI group and non-LUSI group .The prognostic factors and treatment outcomes were compared between the two groups , subgroup analysis was conducted in the high-risk and high-intermediate-risk patients in the two groups .Primary outcomes were overall survival ( OS), progression-free survival ( PFS) , loco-regional recurrence ( LR) , distant metastasis ( DM) , and treatment failure (TF).The survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.The survival rates between different groups were compared using the Log-rank test .Prognostic factors for survival were analyzed using a Cox propor-tional hazards regression model .Results The 5-year OS and PFS for all the patients were 92.8%and 89.7%, respectively;the 5-year LR, DM, and TF were 4.5%, 6.4%, and 7.8%, respectively .Univariate analysis re-vealed that LUSI was a significant predictor of OS and PFS ( P=0.015 , 0.035 ) .Cox proportional hazard model demonstrated a significantly decreased OS and PFS in the LUSI group compared with the non -LUSI group ( P=0.041 , RR=0.346 , 95%CI:0.125-0.959;P=0.041 , RR=0.411 , 95%CI:0.175-0.963 ) .Subgroup univariate analysis showed that for high-risk and high-intermediate-risk patients, LUSI was a significant predictor of TF ( P=0.034 ) .Conclusions LUSI may be a significant predictor of reduced OS and PFS in patients with stage Ⅰ endometrial carcinoma treated with adjuvant radiotherapy .In addition, LUSI may be associated with treatment failure in high-risk and high-intermediate-risk patients .
出处 《协和医学杂志》 2016年第4期246-252,共7页 Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital
关键词 子宫内膜癌 术后放疗 子宫下段受累 高中危 预后因素 endometrial carcinoma postoperative radiotherapy lower uterine segment involvement high-intermediate risk prognostic factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Mayr NA, Wen BC, Benda JA, et al. Postoperative radiationtherapy in clinical stage I endometrial cancer: corpus, cervical, and lower uterine segment involvement-patterns offailure [J]. Radiology, 1995, 196: 323-328.
  • 2Madom LM, Brown AK, Lui F , et al. Lower uterine segmentinvolvement as a predictor for lymph node spread in endometrialcarcinoma [J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2007, 107: 75-78.
  • 3Misirlioglu S, Guzel AB, Gulec UK, et al. Prognostic factorsdetermining recurrence in early-stage endometrial cancer[J]. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol, 2012, 33: 610-614.
  • 4Doll KM, Tseng J , Denslow SA, et al. High-grade endometrialcancer: revisiting the impact of tumor size and locationon outcomes [J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2014, 132: 44-49.
  • 5National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN ClinicalPractice Guidelines In Uterine Neoplasms, V. 1. 2015 [EB/OL]. http://www. nccn. org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/uterine, pdf.
  • 6Pointreau Y, Kreps S, Hennequin C. Side effects evaluationof ionizing radiation [J]. Cancer Radiother, 2010, 14: 246249.
  • 7Klopp A, Smith BD, Alektiar K, et al. The role of postoperativeradiation therapy for endometrial cancer: Executive summaryof an American Society for Radiation Oncology evidencebasedguideline [J] . Pract Radiat Oncol, 2014, 4 :137-144.
  • 8Kupets R, Le T, Le T, et al. The role of adjuvant therapy inendometrial cancer [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2013 , 35 :375-379.
  • 9Gemer 0, Gdalevich M, Voldarsky M, et al. Lower uterinesegment involvement is associated with adverse outcome in patientswith stage I endometroid endometrial cancer: results ofa multicenter study [J] . Eur J Surg Oncol, 2009, 35 :865-869.
  • 10Brown AK, Madom L, Moore R , et al. The prognostic significanceof lower uterine segment involvement in surgicallystaged endometrial cancer patients with negative nodes [J] .Gynecol Oncol, 2007, 105: 55-58.

同被引文献16

引证文献1

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部