摘要
在知识论的意义上,判例是法律秩序不断进化的产物,同时,又是一个在个案中进行知识建构的过程;在功能论的意义上,判例的生成既在于实现同案同判,又在于实现个案正义,从而存在形式主义与实质主义的分歧。判例生成的理论范式为建立中国案例指导的实践逻辑提供"理想类型"意义上的参照。据此,案例指导制度应当成为法典理性的发展机制和法官经验的转化机制,应当按照司法权的运作逻辑生成指导性案例,从而实现一般正义与个案正义的统一。
From the view of the theory of knowledge,the legal precedent is a product of legal order evolving unceasingly and a process of constructing knowledge in individual cases. From the view of the theory of function,the generation of legal precedent lies in the realization of both the same verdict in the same kind case and case justice. The theoretical paradigm of legal precedent generation provides references in the significance of"ideal type"to establish the practice logic of Chinese guiding cases. Hereby,the case guiding system must become the development mechanisms of code rationality and transfer mechanisms of judge experience,and must according to the jurisdiction operation logic generate guiding cases,thus achieving the general justice and case justice.
出处
《兰州学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第7期122-129,共8页
基金
2012年度教育部哲学社会科学青年基金项目"指导性案例的创制技术与适用方法研究"(项目编号:12YJC820096)
2015年度国家社会科学基金青年项目"结果导向的司法决策研究"(项目编号:15CFX037)
中国博士后科学基金第58批面上资助项目"法官决策行为模型的构建与应用"(项目编号:2015M580192)
关键词
判例生成
建构主义
进化主义
实质主义
形式主义
legal precedent generation
constructivism
evolutionism
substantially
formalism